2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Socialist Realism in China

Dave Laing

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Writing is in fact a crucial term from which to begin to understand the momentum and trajectory of cultural policy and practice in China. For the originality of the Marxist aesthetic developed within the Chinese Revolution lies in its precise re-definition of the relations of production of art-works in China, and the place of such activity within a whole network of ideological/writing practices, dominated by the famous wall-posters, the tatzupao . In traditional, Imperial China, possession of culture in this sense was a necessary qualification for a position of power, as political official or magistrate. Lu Hsun&s;s contribution was nevertheless an important one for Marxist writing as a whole, and in contemporary China he is honoured as the great precursor of today&s;s cultural policies. In China, however, an insistence on the continuing need for ideological struggle within the revolution has been at the forefront of cultural policy since 1949.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Writing is in fact a crucial term from which to begin to understand the momentum and trajectory of cultural policy and practice in China. For the originality of the Marxist aesthetic developed within the Chinese Revolution lies in its precise re-definition of the relations of production of art-works in China, and the place of such activity within a whole network of ideological/writing practices, dominated by the famous wall-posters, the tatzupao . In traditional, Imperial China, possession of culture in this sense was a necessary qualification for a position of power, as political official or magistrate. Lu Hsun&s;s contribution was nevertheless an important one for Marxist writing as a whole, and in contemporary China he is honoured as the great precursor of today&s;s cultural policies. In China, however, an insistence on the continuing need for ideological struggle within the revolution has been at the forefront of cultural policy since 1949.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Writing is in fact a crucial term from which to begin to understand the momentum and trajectory of cultural policy and practice in China. For the originality of the Marxist aesthetic developed within the Chinese Revolution lies in its precise re-definition of the relations of production of art-works in China, and the place of such activity within a whole network of ideological/writing practices, dominated by the famous wall-posters, the tatzupao . In traditional, Imperial China, possession of culture in this sense was a necessary qualification for a position of power, as political official or magistrate. Lu Hsun&s;s contribution was nevertheless an important one for Marxist writing as a whole, and in contemporary China he is honoured as the great precursor of today&s;s cultural policies. In China, however, an insistence on the continuing need for ideological struggle within the revolution has been at the forefront of cultural policy since 1949.

Key concepts: Realism, China, Political science, Epistemology, Philosophy, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Socialist Realism in China — Research Paper | ScholarLens