Routine Impunity as Practice (in Myanmar)
Nick Cheesman
Abstract
Nick Cheesman
Abstract
Whereas impunity is typically known by the absence of accountability, this article attends to impunity’s presence. It does so via two instances of impunity drawn from research in contemporary Myanmar. In these, police and soldiers contained and managed demands for accountability for torture and killing, even as political and social conditions seemed to change in favor of human rights. Through them, the article invites a rethinking of \nimpunity beyond the parameters of projects for accountability in the case of past, massive human rights violations, so as to take the recurrent, routine \npractice of impunity seriously.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Whereas impunity is typically known by the absence of accountability, this article attends to impunity’s presence. It does so via two instances of impunity drawn from research in contemporary Myanmar. In these, police and soldiers contained and managed demands for accountability for torture and killing, even as political and social conditions seemed to change in favor of human rights. Through them, the article invites a rethinking of \nimpunity beyond the parameters of projects for accountability in the case of past, massive human rights violations, so as to take the recurrent, routine \npractice of impunity seriously.
Key concepts: Impunity, Accountability, Torture, Human rights, Politics, Political science, Law, Criminology