2019Human Rights QuarterlyRequires access

Routine Impunity as Practice (in Myanmar)

Nick Cheesman

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Whereas impunity is typically known by the absence of accountability, this article attends to impunity’s presence. It does so via two instances of impunity drawn from research in contemporary Myanmar. In these, police and soldiers contained and managed demands for accountability for torture and killing, even as political and social conditions seemed to change in favor of human rights. Through them, the article invites a rethinking of \nimpunity beyond the parameters of projects for accountability in the case of past, massive human rights violations, so as to take the recurrent, routine \npractice of impunity seriously.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Whereas impunity is typically known by the absence of accountability, this article attends to impunity’s presence. It does so via two instances of impunity drawn from research in contemporary Myanmar. In these, police and soldiers contained and managed demands for accountability for torture and killing, even as political and social conditions seemed to change in favor of human rights. Through them, the article invites a rethinking of \nimpunity beyond the parameters of projects for accountability in the case of past, massive human rights violations, so as to take the recurrent, routine \npractice of impunity seriously.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Whereas impunity is typically known by the absence of accountability, this article attends to impunity’s presence. It does so via two instances of impunity drawn from research in contemporary Myanmar. In these, police and soldiers contained and managed demands for accountability for torture and killing, even as political and social conditions seemed to change in favor of human rights. Through them, the article invites a rethinking of \nimpunity beyond the parameters of projects for accountability in the case of past, massive human rights violations, so as to take the recurrent, routine \npractice of impunity seriously.

Key concepts: Impunity, Accountability, Torture, Human rights, Politics, Political science, Law, Criminology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Routine Impunity as Practice (in Myanmar) — Research Paper | ScholarLens