ScholarLens Back to search
2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

EUV reticle defectivity protection options

Michael J. Lercel, Christophe Smeets, Mark A. van de Kerkhof, Amo Chen, Tjarko van Empel, Vadim Banine

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

EUV pellicles have been enabled to provide customers with defect protection for EUV reticles. However, due to the absorption that is much higher than for DUV pellicles, using the pellicle has certain disadvantages. Most significant is the reduction in throughput caused by the absorption of EUV photons in the pellicle. This leads to a customer decision to use a pellicle and accept the reduced throughput, or to not use a pellicle and have additional inspection steps to check the cleanliness of the EUV reticle. These tradeoffs vary by customer and use case. This study addresses the balance of factors for using or not using a pellicle through a cost comparison.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

EUV pellicles have been enabled to provide customers with defect protection for EUV reticles. However, due to the absorption that is much higher than for DUV pellicles, using the pellicle has certain disadvantages. Most significant is the reduction in throughput caused by the absorption of EUV photons in the pellicle. This leads to a customer decision to use a pellicle and accept the reduced throughput, or to not use a pellicle and have additional inspection steps to check the cleanliness of the EUV reticle. These tradeoffs vary by customer and use case. This study addresses the balance of factors for using or not using a pellicle through a cost comparison.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

EUV pellicles have been enabled to provide customers with defect protection for EUV reticles. However, due to the absorption that is much higher than for DUV pellicles, using the pellicle has certain disadvantages. Most significant is the reduction in throughput caused by the absorption of EUV photons in the pellicle. This leads to a customer decision to use a pellicle and accept the reduced throughput, or to not use a pellicle and have additional inspection steps to check the cleanliness of the EUV reticle. These tradeoffs vary by customer and use case. This study addresses the balance of factors for using or not using a pellicle through a cost comparison.

Key concepts: Reticle, Extreme ultraviolet lithography, Extreme ultraviolet, Throughput, Absorption (acoustics), Computer science, Optics, Reliability engineering

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EUV reticle defectivity protection options — Research Paper | ScholarLens