2010BloodRequires access

Fludarabine Versus No-Treatment In the Patients with CLL Stage A

Jean‐Yves Cahn, Arben Ivanaj, Xavier Pivot, Erion Dobi, Polikron Pulluqi, Pal Xhumari

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Abstract 4639 Background. Fludarabine is an effective treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) alones and in combined terapy in untreatment CLL. The standard recomandation for the stage A Binet, is to delay any treatement until progression. We compared the benefit of early exposure to fludarabine versus no-treatment in the patients with CLL stage A. Methods. Between 2000 and 2004, we randomzed 77 patients with CLL stage A to be treated; fludarabine 25 mg/m2, administered intravenously daily for 5 days every 28 days versus no treatment until disease progression. The treated group with received the assigned treatment for a maximum of 6 cycles. Both groups evaluated evry 2 month diseases progression. The NCI-WG response criteria for CLL was refered for analized result. Results. Among the 38 patients treated by fludarabine. Complet response and parcial response were observed 21 % and 74 % of cases respectively. The median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 32 month in the treated group versus 31.5 months in the 39 patients of control group, (p 0.9). The median survival were 124 and 122 months respectively, p 0.7. Existing deletion p53, high risk stage A CLL had no impact on the result. The commonest grade III-IV toxicities were neutropenia (12 %) and trombocytopenia (11 %) in the tretaed group. Conclusions. Fludarabine did not prolong PFS and survival in patients with stage A CLL. Despite the low tolerability of fludarabine there is no need to provide an early exposure in patients with stage A CLL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Abstract 4639 Background. Fludarabine is an effective treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) alones and in combined terapy in untreatment CLL. The standard recomandation for the stage A Binet, is to delay any treatement until progression. We compared the benefit of early exposure to fludarabine versus no-treatment in the patients with CLL stage A. Methods. Between 2000 and 2004, we randomzed 77 patients with CLL stage A to be treated; fludarabine 25 mg/m2, administered intravenously daily for 5 days every 28 days versus no treatment until disease progression. The treated group with received the assigned treatment for a maximum of 6 cycles. Both groups evaluated evry 2 month diseases progression. The NCI-WG response criteria for CLL was refered for analized result. Results. Among the 38 patients treated by fludarabine. Complet response and parcial response were observed 21 % and 74 % of cases respectively. The median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 32 month in the treated group versus 31.5 months in the 39 patients of control group, (p 0.9). The median survival were 124 and 122 months respectively, p 0.7. Existing deletion p53, high risk stage A CLL had no impact on the result. The commonest grade III-IV toxicities were neutropenia (12 %) and trombocytopenia (11 %) in the tretaed group. Conclusions. Fludarabine did not prolong PFS and survival in patients with stage A CLL. Despite the low tolerability of fludarabine there is no need to provide an early exposure in patients with stage A CLL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Abstract 4639 Background. Fludarabine is an effective treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) alones and in combined terapy in untreatment CLL. The standard recomandation for the stage A Binet, is to delay any treatement until progression. We compared the benefit of early exposure to fludarabine versus no-treatment in the patients with CLL stage A. Methods. Between 2000 and 2004, we randomzed 77 patients with CLL stage A to be treated; fludarabine 25 mg/m2, administered intravenously daily for 5 days every 28 days versus no treatment until disease progression. The treated group with received the assigned treatment for a maximum of 6 cycles. Both groups evaluated evry 2 month diseases progression. The NCI-WG response criteria for CLL was refered for analized result. Results. Among the 38 patients treated by fludarabine. Complet response and parcial response were observed 21 % and 74 % of cases respectively. The median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 32 month in the treated group versus 31.5 months in the 39 patients of control group, (p 0.9). The median survival were 124 and 122 months respectively, p 0.7. Existing deletion p53, high risk stage A CLL had no impact on the result. The commonest grade III-IV toxicities were neutropenia (12 %) and trombocytopenia (11 %) in the tretaed group. Conclusions. Fludarabine did not prolong PFS and survival in patients with stage A CLL. Despite the low tolerability of fludarabine there is no need to provide an early exposure in patients with stage A CLL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Key concepts: Fludarabine, Medicine, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Neutropenia, Stage (stratigraphy), Internal medicine, Tolerability, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fludarabine Versus No-Treatment In the Patients with CLL Stage A — Research Paper | ScholarLens