2019Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN)Open access

Analysis and simulation of three MANET routing protocols: A research on AODV, DSR & DSDV characteristics and their performance evaluation

Murad Ghazy Khalaf Alabdullah, Bassam Mohsin Atiyah, Kaesar Sabah Khalaf, Saber Hameed Yadgar

Open full text 20 citations

Abstract

Mobile ad-hoc network allows electronic devices to independently configure the communication; even if the device changes its position, the (MANET) can maintain the connectivity among the devices since it has the capability to arrange a temporary network dynamically. The lack of central infrastructure and the freedom of mobile nodes to move randomly will create several problems, like routing and security issues. MANET requires a stable routing algorithm to adapt to the network that changes its topology randomly at any time. Several studies were conducted with different scenarios to suggest the best protocol for routing. However, a clear performance evaluation is still a missing part, because the dissimilarities in the mechanism of the protocol can lead to important performance differences. This article provides a performance assessment of (DSR), (DSDV), and (AODV) protocols. Research results and the evaluation of the network are made based on network size, mobility, and variable network load by using NS2 application for simulation. The results reveal that the (AODV, DSR) are more efficient than DSDV and reasonably more proper for ad-hoc applications and projects.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mobile ad-hoc network allows electronic devices to independently configure the communication; even if the device changes its position, the (MANET) can maintain the connectivity among the devices since it has the capability to arrange a temporary network dynamically. The lack of central infrastructure and the freedom of mobile nodes to move randomly will create several problems, like routing and security issues. MANET requires a stable routing algorithm to adapt to the network that changes its topology randomly at any time. Several studies were conducted with different scenarios to suggest the best protocol for routing. However, a clear performance evaluation is still a missing part, because the dissimilarities in the mechanism of the protocol can lead to important performance differences. This article provides a performance assessment of (DSR), (DSDV), and (AODV) protocols. Research results and the evaluation of the network are made based on network size, mobility, and variable network load by using NS2 application for simulation. The results reveal that the (AODV, DSR) are more efficient than DSDV and reasonably more proper for ad-hoc applications and projects.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mobile ad-hoc network allows electronic devices to independently configure the communication; even if the device changes its position, the (MANET) can maintain the connectivity among the devices since it has the capability to arrange a temporary network dynamically. The lack of central infrastructure and the freedom of mobile nodes to move randomly will create several problems, like routing and security issues. MANET requires a stable routing algorithm to adapt to the network that changes its topology randomly at any time. Several studies were conducted with different scenarios to suggest the best protocol for routing. However, a clear performance evaluation is still a missing part, because the dissimilarities in the mechanism of the protocol can lead to important performance differences. This article provides a performance assessment of (DSR), (DSDV), and (AODV) protocols. Research results and the evaluation of the network are made based on network size, mobility, and variable network load by using NS2 application for simulation. The results reveal that the (AODV, DSR) are more efficient than DSDV and reasonably more proper for ad-hoc applications and projects.

Key concepts: Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector routing, Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing, Computer network, Computer science, Optimized Link State Routing Protocol, Mobile ad hoc network, Routing protocol, Distance-vector routing protocol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis and simulation of three MANET routing protocols: A research on AODV, DSR & DSDV characteristics and their performance evaluation — Research Paper | ScholarLens