2019•Muscle & NerveRequires access

The motor unit and quantitative electromyography

Mark B. Bromberg

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

Abstract Electromyography (EMG) assesses the anatomic motor unit (A‐MU), but knowledge of its anatomy, physiology, and changes with pathology is limited. The electrophysiological motor unit (E‐MU) and its motor unit potential (E‐MUP) represents a fraction of the A‐MU. Routine EMG assesses a limited number of E‐MUP waveform characteristics (metrics) and their magnitudes qualitatively scaled in a nonlinear manner. Another approach is quantitative EMG (QEMG), whereby 20+ E‐MUPs are extracted and both basic and derived metrics obtained and values expressed quantitatively. In diseased muscle, many E‐MUP metrics may be normal, which complicates diagnostic interpretation. In QEMG, E‐MUP metrics can be clustered and statistical analyses performed to assign probabilities that E‐MUPs (and the muscle) are normal, neuropathic, or myopathic. In this article we review what is known about the A‐MU, the restricted E‐MU, E‐MUP metrics, and what QEMG offers currently and in the future.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Electromyography (EMG) assesses the anatomic motor unit (A‐MU), but knowledge of its anatomy, physiology, and changes with pathology is limited. The electrophysiological motor unit (E‐MU) and its motor unit potential (E‐MUP) represents a fraction of the A‐MU. Routine EMG assesses a limited number of E‐MUP waveform characteristics (metrics) and their magnitudes qualitatively scaled in a nonlinear manner. Another approach is quantitative EMG (QEMG), whereby 20+ E‐MUPs are extracted and both basic and derived metrics obtained and values expressed quantitatively. In diseased muscle, many E‐MUP metrics may be normal, which complicates diagnostic interpretation. In QEMG, E‐MUP metrics can be clustered and statistical analyses performed to assign probabilities that E‐MUPs (and the muscle) are normal, neuropathic, or myopathic. In this article we review what is known about the A‐MU, the restricted E‐MU, E‐MUP metrics, and what QEMG offers currently and in the future.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Electromyography (EMG) assesses the anatomic motor unit (A‐MU), but knowledge of its anatomy, physiology, and changes with pathology is limited. The electrophysiological motor unit (E‐MU) and its motor unit potential (E‐MUP) represents a fraction of the A‐MU. Routine EMG assesses a limited number of E‐MUP waveform characteristics (metrics) and their magnitudes qualitatively scaled in a nonlinear manner. Another approach is quantitative EMG (QEMG), whereby 20+ E‐MUPs are extracted and both basic and derived metrics obtained and values expressed quantitatively. In diseased muscle, many E‐MUP metrics may be normal, which complicates diagnostic interpretation. In QEMG, E‐MUP metrics can be clustered and statistical analyses performed to assign probabilities that E‐MUPs (and the muscle) are normal, neuropathic, or myopathic. In this article we review what is known about the A‐MU, the restricted E‐MU, E‐MUP metrics, and what QEMG offers currently and in the future.

Key concepts: Motor unit, Electromyography, Electrodiagnosis, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Electrophysiology, Motor unit recruitment, Neuroscience, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The motor unit and quantitative electromyography — Research Paper | ScholarLens