1977•Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Management of Navy Test and Evaluation Milestones.

George A. Bowley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The report briefly identifies the requirement to establish viable test and evaluation monitoring during the acquisition of major systems and equipment, and recognizes the significance of the test and evaluation effort as a prerequisite for successful Defense System Acquisition Review Council (DSARC) decisions and the further commitment of development and production funding. It further recognizes that organizational commanders now require a more integrated overview of command test and evaluation efforts so that they may speak with a more viable corporate voice. This study report examines the functions and capabilities of Naval Material Command (NAVMAT) Test and Evaluation Coordinators to provide this type of overall assessment and concludes that no administrative support system yet exists to enable the coordinator to collect and display corporate test and evaluation data in usuable report formats. The report proposes a computerized test and evaluation data system and defines specific input and report output formats that are needed by the organization to assess test and evaluation status. Ideas for future system sophistication are provided, and sample report formats are included in the appendix.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The report briefly identifies the requirement to establish viable test and evaluation monitoring during the acquisition of major systems and equipment, and recognizes the significance of the test and evaluation effort as a prerequisite for successful Defense System Acquisition Review Council (DSARC) decisions and the further commitment of development and production funding. It further recognizes that organizational commanders now require a more integrated overview of command test and evaluation efforts so that they may speak with a more viable corporate voice. This study report examines the functions and capabilities of Naval Material Command (NAVMAT) Test and Evaluation Coordinators to provide this type of overall assessment and concludes that no administrative support system yet exists to enable the coordinator to collect and display corporate test and evaluation data in usuable report formats. The report proposes a computerized test and evaluation data system and defines specific input and report output formats that are needed by the organization to assess test and evaluation status. Ideas for future system sophistication are provided, and sample report formats are included in the appendix.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The report briefly identifies the requirement to establish viable test and evaluation monitoring during the acquisition of major systems and equipment, and recognizes the significance of the test and evaluation effort as a prerequisite for successful Defense System Acquisition Review Council (DSARC) decisions and the further commitment of development and production funding. It further recognizes that organizational commanders now require a more integrated overview of command test and evaluation efforts so that they may speak with a more viable corporate voice. This study report examines the functions and capabilities of Naval Material Command (NAVMAT) Test and Evaluation Coordinators to provide this type of overall assessment and concludes that no administrative support system yet exists to enable the coordinator to collect and display corporate test and evaluation data in usuable report formats. The report proposes a computerized test and evaluation data system and defines specific input and report output formats that are needed by the organization to assess test and evaluation status. Ideas for future system sophistication are provided, and sample report formats are included in the appendix.

Key concepts: Test (biology), Sophistication, Engineering management, Navy, Computer science, Engineering, Knowledge management, Process management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Management of Navy Test and Evaluation Milestones. — Research Paper | ScholarLens