2008Caijing luncongRequires access

Banking Capitalization and Risk-taking Under Capital Adequacy Regulation:Empirical Evidence After Implementing the Capital Adequacy Standards

Lei Xu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The paper investigates the impact the capital adequacy regulation has on bank capitalization and portfolio risk during the first year when the risk-based standard is in effect,exploiting simultaneous equations model.A negative association between change in capital and risk is found.The results suggest that the minimum capital standard is effective in increasing capital adequacy ratio,but not in reducing portfolio risk.Bank size helps banks to increase capital and reduce risks,but the profitability has no significant correlation with changes in capital.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper investigates the impact the capital adequacy regulation has on bank capitalization and portfolio risk during the first year when the risk-based standard is in effect,exploiting simultaneous equations model.A negative association between change in capital and risk is found.The results suggest that the minimum capital standard is effective in increasing capital adequacy ratio,but not in reducing portfolio risk.Bank size helps banks to increase capital and reduce risks,but the profitability has no significant correlation with changes in capital.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper investigates the impact the capital adequacy regulation has on bank capitalization and portfolio risk during the first year when the risk-based standard is in effect,exploiting simultaneous equations model.A negative association between change in capital and risk is found.The results suggest that the minimum capital standard is effective in increasing capital adequacy ratio,but not in reducing portfolio risk.Bank size helps banks to increase capital and reduce risks,but the profitability has no significant correlation with changes in capital.

Key concepts: Risk-adjusted return on capital, Capital adequacy ratio, Economic capital, Capitalization, Capital requirement, Cost of capital, Financial capital, Capital (architecture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Banking Capitalization and Risk-taking Under Capital Adequacy Regulation:Empirical Evidence After Implementing the Capital Adequacy Standards — Research Paper | ScholarLens