2018CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)Open access

An overview of Thorium Utilization in Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycle

José Rubens Maiorino, Francesco Saverio D'Auria, Reza Akbari-Jeyhouni

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

The Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) constructed in the XX century, also called generation II \nreactors, are still in operation, most of them Light Water Reactors, but are being decommissioned. \nThese reactors have a low burn up (~30 MWD/kg U) and utilize UO2 as nuclear fuel and are \noperating in a Once Through Cycle (OTC); they use a very low energy content of the natural \nresources (~0,5%). To overcome economic and political and partly safety issues, since the end of \nlast century, and beginning of this century, the nuclear industry launched a new generation of \nevolutionary reactors, called Generation III, such as the Westinghouse AP 1000, and AREVA EPR. \nThese reactors still use uranium as primary source but have an increased burn up (~60 MWD/Kg \nU), which although increasing the utilization of the natural resources (up to 1%), still are not \nsignificant to be considered sustainable: if only uranium is used in an OTC, uranium will be \nexhausted in this century. To increase the utilization of natural resources, recycling of uranium and \nplutonium is already in use in many countries and used as Mixed Oxide of U-Pu fuel (MOX) in the \nsame thermal reactors. To turn nuclear energy sustainable, a long-term deployment of innovative \nreactors is underway. These reactors and their associated fuel cycle are old concepts with \ntechnological improvements and generically denominated as Generation IV, are in development \nand, in some cases, they are breeders, HLW burners, and efficient concepts. Another concept that \nalthough not new is constitute by the Small Modular Reactors (SMR), with power less than 300 \nMWe, which nowadays are deserving a lot of attention by the nuclear industry. Another option is to \nutilize thorium as a primary source of energy. Although not fissile at thermal energy, it produces \n233U, which is one of best fissile nuclide (number of neutrons produced per neutron absorbed). Also, \nit is three times more abundant than uranium in the earth crust and has thermal physics properties \nwhen used as (U-Th) O2 better than UO2. Several Th/U fuel cycles, using thermal and fast reactors \nwere proposed and are still under investigation. Although, the first reactors to utilize thorium were \nPWR, using (U-Th)O2, such as the Indian Point, and Shipping Port, thorium has been proposed as \nfuel for the molten salt reactor, the advanced heavy water reactor, High Temperature Reactors, \nPebble Bed reactor, fast breeder reactors, and more recently, for the innovative accelerator driven \nsystem in a double strata fuel cycle and for the Generation IV, such as the LFTR - Liquid Fluoride \nThorium Reactor, which is a self-sustainable Molten Salt Reactor, promising to turn nuclear energy \nby fission in a sustainable source, with a utilization of the natural resources of 100%. This paper, \nbesides an introduction of the present time uranium fuel cycles, will give an over view of the \nthorium utilization in nuclear reactors and fuel cycles, with an emphasis in Advanced PWR.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) constructed in the XX century, also called generation II \nreactors, are still in operation, most of them Light Water Reactors, but are being decommissioned. \nThese reactors have a low burn up (~30 MWD/kg U) and utilize UO2 as nuclear fuel and are \noperating in a Once Through Cycle (OTC); they use a very low energy content of the natural \nresources (~0,5%). To overcome economic and political and partly safety issues, since the end of \nlast century, and beginning of this century, the nuclear industry launched a new generation of \nevolutionary reactors, called Generation III, such as the Westinghouse AP 1000, and AREVA EPR. \nThese reactors still use uranium as primary source but have an increased burn up (~60 MWD/Kg \nU), which although increasing the utilization of the natural resources (up to 1%), still are not \nsignificant to be considered sustainable: if only uranium is used in an OTC, uranium will be \nexhausted in this century. To increase the utilization of natural resources, recycling of uranium and \nplutonium is already in use in many countries and used as Mixed Oxide of U-Pu fuel (MOX) in the \nsame thermal reactors. To turn nuclear energy sustainable, a long-term deployment of innovative \nreactors is underway. These reactors and their associated fuel cycle are old concepts with \ntechnological improvements and generically denominated as Generation IV, are in development \nand, in some cases, they are breeders, HLW burners, and efficient concepts. Another concept that \nalthough not new is constitute by the Small Modular Reactors (SMR), with power less than 300 \nMWe, which nowadays are deserving a lot of attention by the nuclear industry. Another option is to \nutilize thorium as a primary source of energy. Although not fissile at thermal energy, it produces \n233U, which is one of best fissile nuclide (number of neutrons produced per neutron absorbed). Also, \nit is three times more abundant than uranium in the earth crust and has thermal physics properties \nwhen used as (U-Th) O2 better than UO2. Several Th/U fuel cycles, using thermal and fast reactors \nwere proposed and are still under investigation. Although, the first reactors to utilize thorium were \nPWR, using (U-Th)O2, such as the Indian Point, and Shipping Port, thorium has been proposed as \nfuel for the molten salt reactor, the advanced heavy water reactor, High Temperature Reactors, \nPebble Bed reactor, fast breeder reactors, and more recently, for the innovative accelerator driven \nsystem in a double strata fuel cycle and for the Generation IV, such as the LFTR - Liquid Fluoride \nThorium Reactor, which is a self-sustainable Molten Salt Reactor, promising to turn nuclear energy \nby fission in a sustainable source, with a utilization of the natural resources of 100%. This paper, \nbesides an introduction of the present time uranium fuel cycles, will give an over view of the \nthorium utilization in nuclear reactors and fuel cycles, with an emphasis in Advanced PWR.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) constructed in the XX century, also called generation II \nreactors, are still in operation, most of them Light Water Reactors, but are being decommissioned. \nThese reactors have a low burn up (~30 MWD/kg U) and utilize UO2 as nuclear fuel and are \noperating in a Once Through Cycle (OTC); they use a very low energy content of the natural \nresources (~0,5%). To overcome economic and political and partly safety issues, since the end of \nlast century, and beginning of this century, the nuclear industry launched a new generation of \nevolutionary reactors, called Generation III, such as the Westinghouse AP 1000, and AREVA EPR. \nThese reactors still use uranium as primary source but have an increased burn up (~60 MWD/Kg \nU), which although increasing the utilization of the natural resources (up to 1%), still are not \nsignificant to be considered sustainable: if only uranium is used in an OTC, uranium will be \nexhausted in this century. To increase the utilization of natural resources, recycling of uranium and \nplutonium is already in use in many countries and used as Mixed Oxide of U-Pu fuel (MOX) in the \nsame thermal reactors. To turn nuclear energy sustainable, a long-term deployment of innovative \nreactors is underway. These reactors and their associated fuel cycle are old concepts with \ntechnological improvements and generically denominated as Generation IV, are in development \nand, in some cases, they are breeders, HLW burners, and efficient concepts. Another concept that \nalthough not new is constitute by the Small Modular Reactors (SMR), with power less than 300 \nMWe, which nowadays are deserving a lot of attention by the nuclear industry. Another option is to \nutilize thorium as a primary source of energy. Although not fissile at thermal energy, it produces \n233U, which is one of best fissile nuclide (number of neutrons produced per neutron absorbed). Also, \nit is three times more abundant than uranium in the earth crust and has thermal physics properties \nwhen used as (U-Th) O2 better than UO2. Several Th/U fuel cycles, using thermal and fast reactors \nwere proposed and are still under investigation. Although, the first reactors to utilize thorium were \nPWR, using (U-Th)O2, such as the Indian Point, and Shipping Port, thorium has been proposed as \nfuel for the molten salt reactor, the advanced heavy water reactor, High Temperature Reactors, \nPebble Bed reactor, fast breeder reactors, and more recently, for the innovative accelerator driven \nsystem in a double strata fuel cycle and for the Generation IV, such as the LFTR - Liquid Fluoride \nThorium Reactor, which is a self-sustainable Molten Salt Reactor, promising to turn nuclear energy \nby fission in a sustainable source, with a utilization of the natural resources of 100%. This paper, \nbesides an introduction of the present time uranium fuel cycles, will give an over view of the \nthorium utilization in nuclear reactors and fuel cycles, with an emphasis in Advanced PWR.

Key concepts: Thorium fuel cycle, Fuel cycle, Nuclear engineering, Nuclear fuel cycle, Thorium, Uranium-233, Environmental science, Waste management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An overview of Thorium Utilization in Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycle — Research Paper | ScholarLens