2008•The American Journal of GastroenterologyRequires access

The Effects of High Definition (HD), Electronic Magnification (EM), White Light (WL) and Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) on the Detection of Adenomatous, Hyperplastic and Non-Neoplastic Polyps at Screening Colonoscopy

Francisco Eduardo Ramirez

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose: The role of newly introduced and available optical technologies upon polyp detection at colonoscopy is controversial. Aim: To determine and compare the detection rate of tubular adenomas (TA), hyperplastic (HP), and non-neoplastic (NN) polyps during screening colonoscopy. Methods: Patients undergoing screening colonoscopy using either of the following optical technology combinations upon withdrawal of the scope were included: White light with high definition and electronic magnification (WL/HD+/EM+); White light with high definition but without electronic magnification (WL/HD+/EM−) White light without high definition and without electronic magnification (WL/HD-/EM−) or, Narrow band imaging with high definition and with electronic magnification (NBI/HD+/EM+) EM was set at 1.5 X For the HD with/without EM studies the Olympus 180H series scopes were used; for the non-HD studies, the Olympus PCF- and CFQ-180 scopes were utilized. All polyps seen during colonoscopy were removed. Histology was used as the final diagnosis for the polyps removed. Non-neoplastic polyps were defined as: normal mucosa, prominent lymphoid aggregates or hyperplastic mucosa on histopathological evaluation. Setting: Endoscopy unit at a VAMC. Statistical analysis: Proportional data was compared using the Chi-square test. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 600 patients underwent screening colonoscopy: 400 used WL with (291) or without (109) HD; 200 used NBI with HD. The results of the polyp detection are summarized in the Table. There were no statistically significant differences in the detection rates of TAs, HP and NN polyps among the different optical techniques used.Table: Detection rate for tubular adenomas, hyperplastic and non-neoplastic polyps.Conclusion: 1. The detection rates for adenomatous, hyperplastic and non-neoplastic polyps were not affected by the different optical technologies evaluated. 2. This data supports our previous work suggesting that the detection of missed pathology (at tandem colonoscopy) is independent of the endoscope optics used.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: The role of newly introduced and available optical technologies upon polyp detection at colonoscopy is controversial. Aim: To determine and compare the detection rate of tubular adenomas (TA), hyperplastic (HP), and non-neoplastic (NN) polyps during screening colonoscopy. Methods: Patients undergoing screening colonoscopy using either of the following optical technology combinations upon withdrawal of the scope were included: White light with high definition and electronic magnification (WL/HD+/EM+); White light with high definition but without electronic magnification (WL/HD+/EM−) White light without high definition and without electronic magnification (WL/HD-/EM−) or, Narrow band imaging with high definition and with electronic magnification (NBI/HD+/EM+) EM was set at 1.5 X For the HD with/without EM studies the Olympus 180H series scopes were used; for the non-HD studies, the Olympus PCF- and CFQ-180 scopes were utilized. All polyps seen during colonoscopy were removed. Histology was used as the final diagnosis for the polyps removed. Non-neoplastic polyps were defined as: normal mucosa, prominent lymphoid aggregates or hyperplastic mucosa on histopathological evaluation. Setting: Endoscopy unit at a VAMC. Statistical analysis: Proportional data was compared using the Chi-square test. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 600 patients underwent screening colonoscopy: 400 used WL with (291) or without (109) HD; 200 used NBI with HD. The results of the polyp detection are summarized in the Table. There were no statistically significant differences in the detection rates of TAs, HP and NN polyps among the different optical techniques used.Table: Detection rate for tubular adenomas, hyperplastic and non-neoplastic polyps.Conclusion: 1. The detection rates for adenomatous, hyperplastic and non-neoplastic polyps were not affected by the different optical technologies evaluated. 2. This data supports our previous work suggesting that the detection of missed pathology (at tandem colonoscopy) is independent of the endoscope optics used.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: The role of newly introduced and available optical technologies upon polyp detection at colonoscopy is controversial. Aim: To determine and compare the detection rate of tubular adenomas (TA), hyperplastic (HP), and non-neoplastic (NN) polyps during screening colonoscopy. Methods: Patients undergoing screening colonoscopy using either of the following optical technology combinations upon withdrawal of the scope were included: White light with high definition and electronic magnification (WL/HD+/EM+); White light with high definition but without electronic magnification (WL/HD+/EM−) White light without high definition and without electronic magnification (WL/HD-/EM−) or, Narrow band imaging with high definition and with electronic magnification (NBI/HD+/EM+) EM was set at 1.5 X For the HD with/without EM studies the Olympus 180H series scopes were used; for the non-HD studies, the Olympus PCF- and CFQ-180 scopes were utilized. All polyps seen during colonoscopy were removed. Histology was used as the final diagnosis for the polyps removed. Non-neoplastic polyps were defined as: normal mucosa, prominent lymphoid aggregates or hyperplastic mucosa on histopathological evaluation. Setting: Endoscopy unit at a VAMC. Statistical analysis: Proportional data was compared using the Chi-square test. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 600 patients underwent screening colonoscopy: 400 used WL with (291) or without (109) HD; 200 used NBI with HD. The results of the polyp detection are summarized in the Table. There were no statistically significant differences in the detection rates of TAs, HP and NN polyps among the different optical techniques used.Table: Detection rate for tubular adenomas, hyperplastic and non-neoplastic polyps.Conclusion: 1. The detection rates for adenomatous, hyperplastic and non-neoplastic polyps were not affected by the different optical technologies evaluated. 2. This data supports our previous work suggesting that the detection of missed pathology (at tandem colonoscopy) is independent of the endoscope optics used.

Key concepts: Magnification, Hyperplastic Polyp, Colonoscopy, Narrow-band imaging, Medicine, White light, Adenomatous polyps, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effects of High Definition (HD), Electronic Magnification (EM), White Light (WL) and Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) on the Detection of Adenomatous, Hyperplastic and Non-Neoplastic Polyps at Screening Colonoscopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens