Preoperative cephalic vein diameter and diabetes do not limit the choice of wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula
Guocun Hou, Yonghong Yan, Guangyi Li, Yi Hou, Xiuli Sun, Na Yin, Guozhen Feng
Abstract
Guocun Hou, Yonghong Yan, Guangyi Li, Yi Hou, Xiuli Sun, Na Yin, Guozhen Feng
Abstract
Aim: To identify predictors that affect initial maturation of new wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula and evaluate the clinical effects of the ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas creation in the event of first wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula failure. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent first wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula creation between September 2016 and May 2018. Currently, we prefer to re-create an ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula when the first wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula fails. Predictors of successful radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used to calculate successful radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula rates. Results: Univariate analysis showed that predictive factors for successful wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula include larger preoperative cephalic vein diameter ( p = 0.001) and non-diabetic kidney disease ( p = 0.007). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed cephalic vein diameter ⩾2 mm (odds ratio = 4.55, 95% confidence interval = (1.49–13.92), p = 0.008) and non-diabetic kidney disease (odds ratio = 4.22, 95% confidence interval = (1.38–12.88), p = 0.011) to be independent predictors for successful radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula. We re-created ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas in 15 patients among the 21 failed wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas; all these arteriovenous fistulas maintained clinical maturation following up for 1–2 years. Conclusion: Small cephalic vein diameter (<2 mm) and diabetes were independent risk factors for failed wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas, but this risk could be overcome by aggressive ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula to address a failed first attempt. Cephalic vein diameter is more important during the maturation stage, and once maturation has occurred, diabetes has an additive role in determining the patency of wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula. The “wrist RCAVF first, ipsilateral mid-forearm RCAVF second” strategy is the most clinically significant message of our study.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Aim: To identify predictors that affect initial maturation of new wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula and evaluate the clinical effects of the ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas creation in the event of first wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula failure. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent first wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula creation between September 2016 and May 2018. Currently, we prefer to re-create an ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula when the first wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula fails. Predictors of successful radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used to calculate successful radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula rates. Results: Univariate analysis showed that predictive factors for successful wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula include larger preoperative cephalic vein diameter ( p = 0.001) and non-diabetic kidney disease ( p = 0.007). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed cephalic vein diameter ⩾2 mm (odds ratio = 4.55, 95% confidence interval = (1.49–13.92), p = 0.008) and non-diabetic kidney disease (odds ratio = 4.22, 95% confidence interval = (1.38–12.88), p = 0.011) to be independent predictors for successful radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula. We re-created ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas in 15 patients among the 21 failed wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas; all these arteriovenous fistulas maintained clinical maturation following up for 1–2 years. Conclusion: Small cephalic vein diameter (<2 mm) and diabetes were independent risk factors for failed wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas, but this risk could be overcome by aggressive ipsilateral mid-forearm radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula to address a failed first attempt. Cephalic vein diameter is more important during the maturation stage, and once maturation has occurred, diabetes has an additive role in determining the patency of wrist radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula. The “wrist RCAVF first, ipsilateral mid-forearm RCAVF second” strategy is the most clinically significant message of our study.
Key concepts: Cephalic vein, Medicine, Arteriovenous fistula, Fistula, Forearm, Wrist, Univariate analysis, Surgery