2019Diabetologie und StoffwechselRequires access

Efficacy of semaglutide vs. dulaglutide across baseline HbA1c in SUSTAIN 7

Wolfgang Ekkehard Schmidt, Richard E. Pratley, J. Pérez Frías, Harish Kumar, John R. Petrie, Andrea Navarria, Morten Abildlund Nielsen, J Schwensen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Semaglutide a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) showed significant and clinically meaningful HbA1c and body weight reductions across the SUSTAIN programme. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3b SUSTAIN 7 trial evaluated semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg by baseline HbA1c in subjects with T2D. Methods: Efficacy data from SUSTAIN 7 were evaluated; subjects were stratified by baseline HbA1c (≤7.5%, 7.5 – 8.0%, 8.0 – 8.5%, 8.5 – 9.0%, > 9.0%). For treatment target endpoints, missing data were imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements. Results: At week 40, greater reductions in HbA1c were observed with semaglutide vs. dulaglutide across subgroups. Changes from BL in body weight favoured semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg; no significant interaction between treatment and BL HbA1c were observed. More subjects with BL HbA1c > 9% achieved HbA1c < 7% with semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg (44 vs. 18%) and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg (55 vs. 34%). Similarly, more subjects with BL HbA1c > 9% achieved HbA1c ≤6.5% with semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg (32 vs. 9%) and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg (41 vs. 20%). Conclusion: Greater reductions in HbA1c and body weight were observed with semaglutide vs. dulaglutide in all subjects regardless of BL HbA1c.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Semaglutide a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) showed significant and clinically meaningful HbA1c and body weight reductions across the SUSTAIN programme. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3b SUSTAIN 7 trial evaluated semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg by baseline HbA1c in subjects with T2D. Methods: Efficacy data from SUSTAIN 7 were evaluated; subjects were stratified by baseline HbA1c (≤7.5%, 7.5 – 8.0%, 8.0 – 8.5%, 8.5 – 9.0%, > 9.0%). For treatment target endpoints, missing data were imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements. Results: At week 40, greater reductions in HbA1c were observed with semaglutide vs. dulaglutide across subgroups. Changes from BL in body weight favoured semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg; no significant interaction between treatment and BL HbA1c were observed. More subjects with BL HbA1c > 9% achieved HbA1c < 7% with semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg (44 vs. 18%) and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg (55 vs. 34%). Similarly, more subjects with BL HbA1c > 9% achieved HbA1c ≤6.5% with semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg (32 vs. 9%) and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg (41 vs. 20%). Conclusion: Greater reductions in HbA1c and body weight were observed with semaglutide vs. dulaglutide in all subjects regardless of BL HbA1c.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Semaglutide a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) showed significant and clinically meaningful HbA1c and body weight reductions across the SUSTAIN programme. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3b SUSTAIN 7 trial evaluated semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg by baseline HbA1c in subjects with T2D. Methods: Efficacy data from SUSTAIN 7 were evaluated; subjects were stratified by baseline HbA1c (≤7.5%, 7.5 – 8.0%, 8.0 – 8.5%, 8.5 – 9.0%, > 9.0%). For treatment target endpoints, missing data were imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements. Results: At week 40, greater reductions in HbA1c were observed with semaglutide vs. dulaglutide across subgroups. Changes from BL in body weight favoured semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg; no significant interaction between treatment and BL HbA1c were observed. More subjects with BL HbA1c > 9% achieved HbA1c < 7% with semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg (44 vs. 18%) and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg (55 vs. 34%). Similarly, more subjects with BL HbA1c > 9% achieved HbA1c ≤6.5% with semaglutide 0.5 mg vs. dulaglutide 0.75 mg (32 vs. 9%) and semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg (41 vs. 20%). Conclusion: Greater reductions in HbA1c and body weight were observed with semaglutide vs. dulaglutide in all subjects regardless of BL HbA1c.

Key concepts: Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Medicine, Type 2 diabetes, Internal medicine, Exenatide, Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor, Post-hoc analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of semaglutide vs. dulaglutide across baseline HbA1c in SUSTAIN 7 — Research Paper | ScholarLens