2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Enabling Shared Control and Trust in Hybrid SDN/Legacy Networks

Pinyi Shi, Sergio Raul Rivera, Lowell Pike, Zongming Fei, James N. Griffioen, Kenneth L. Calvert

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

A key concept of software-defined networking (SDN) is separation of the control and data plane. This idea provides several benefits, including fine-grained network control and monitoring, and the ability to deploy new services in a limited scope. Unfortunately, it is often cost-prohibitive for enterprises (and universities in particular) to upgrade their existing networks to wholly SDN-capable networks all at once. A compromise solution is to deploy SDN capabilities incrementally in the network. The challenge then is to take full advantage of SDN-based services throughout the network, in an integrated fashion rather than in a few "islands" of SDN support. At the University of Kentucky, SDN has been integrated into the campus network for several years. In this paper, we describe two aspects of this challenge, along with our solution approaches. One is the general reluctance of campus network administrations to allow novel or experimental (SDN-based) services in the production network. The other is how to extend such services throughout the legacy part of the network. For the former, we lay out a set of principles designed to ensure that the production service is not harmed. For the latter, we use policy based routing and a graph database to extend our previously-described VIP Lanes service. Our simulation results in a campus-like topology testbed show that we can provide a host with custom path service even if it is connected to a legacy router.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A key concept of software-defined networking (SDN) is separation of the control and data plane. This idea provides several benefits, including fine-grained network control and monitoring, and the ability to deploy new services in a limited scope. Unfortunately, it is often cost-prohibitive for enterprises (and universities in particular) to upgrade their existing networks to wholly SDN-capable networks all at once. A compromise solution is to deploy SDN capabilities incrementally in the network. The challenge then is to take full advantage of SDN-based services throughout the network, in an integrated fashion rather than in a few "islands" of SDN support. At the University of Kentucky, SDN has been integrated into the campus network for several years. In this paper, we describe two aspects of this challenge, along with our solution approaches. One is the general reluctance of campus network administrations to allow novel or experimental (SDN-based) services in the production network. The other is how to extend such services throughout the legacy part of the network. For the former, we lay out a set of principles designed to ensure that the production service is not harmed. For the latter, we use policy based routing and a graph database to extend our previously-described VIP Lanes service. Our simulation results in a campus-like topology testbed show that we can provide a host with custom path service even if it is connected to a legacy router.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A key concept of software-defined networking (SDN) is separation of the control and data plane. This idea provides several benefits, including fine-grained network control and monitoring, and the ability to deploy new services in a limited scope. Unfortunately, it is often cost-prohibitive for enterprises (and universities in particular) to upgrade their existing networks to wholly SDN-capable networks all at once. A compromise solution is to deploy SDN capabilities incrementally in the network. The challenge then is to take full advantage of SDN-based services throughout the network, in an integrated fashion rather than in a few "islands" of SDN support. At the University of Kentucky, SDN has been integrated into the campus network for several years. In this paper, we describe two aspects of this challenge, along with our solution approaches. One is the general reluctance of campus network administrations to allow novel or experimental (SDN-based) services in the production network. The other is how to extend such services throughout the legacy part of the network. For the former, we lay out a set of principles designed to ensure that the production service is not harmed. For the latter, we use policy based routing and a graph database to extend our previously-described VIP Lanes service. Our simulation results in a campus-like topology testbed show that we can provide a host with custom path service even if it is connected to a legacy router.

Key concepts: Computer science, Software-defined networking, Testbed, Computer network, Forwarding plane, Networking hardware, Distributed computing, Network topology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Enabling Shared Control and Trust in Hybrid SDN/Legacy Networks — Research Paper | ScholarLens