2017•The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social TheoryRequires access

Agency and Structure

Rob Stones

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Theories of structure and agency have long been central to social theory. Two dominant ways of theorizing structure, the relational and the institutional, are distinguished. The idea of relational structures draws attention to networks of social relations, connections, and vertical and horizontal interdependencies between individuals and collectives. The notion of institutional structures refers to the beliefs, values, symbols, ideas, and expectations that make up the mutual knowledge of members of a society. Agency theorists believe both of these structural approaches tend to underplay the role of agency in social relations. Two approaches to agency are identified: the neo‐Kantian tradition and phenomenological tradition; and the pragmatist and symbolic interactionist tradition. More recent contributions are recounted, indicating that contemporary debates are couched less in terms of structure versus agency and more in terms of the precise ways in which these two major aspects of social life intertwine and affect each other.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Theories of structure and agency have long been central to social theory. Two dominant ways of theorizing structure, the relational and the institutional, are distinguished. The idea of relational structures draws attention to networks of social relations, connections, and vertical and horizontal interdependencies between individuals and collectives. The notion of institutional structures refers to the beliefs, values, symbols, ideas, and expectations that make up the mutual knowledge of members of a society. Agency theorists believe both of these structural approaches tend to underplay the role of agency in social relations. Two approaches to agency are identified: the neo‐Kantian tradition and phenomenological tradition; and the pragmatist and symbolic interactionist tradition. More recent contributions are recounted, indicating that contemporary debates are couched less in terms of structure versus agency and more in terms of the precise ways in which these two major aspects of social life intertwine and affect each other.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Theories of structure and agency have long been central to social theory. Two dominant ways of theorizing structure, the relational and the institutional, are distinguished. The idea of relational structures draws attention to networks of social relations, connections, and vertical and horizontal interdependencies between individuals and collectives. The notion of institutional structures refers to the beliefs, values, symbols, ideas, and expectations that make up the mutual knowledge of members of a society. Agency theorists believe both of these structural approaches tend to underplay the role of agency in social relations. Two approaches to agency are identified: the neo‐Kantian tradition and phenomenological tradition; and the pragmatist and symbolic interactionist tradition. More recent contributions are recounted, indicating that contemporary debates are couched less in terms of structure versus agency and more in terms of the precise ways in which these two major aspects of social life intertwine and affect each other.

Key concepts: Structure and agency, Agency (philosophy), Interdependence, Epistemology, Social structure, Sociology, Pragmatism, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Agency and Structure — Research Paper | ScholarLens