2019SMU Law Review ForumOpen access

Overwriting and Under-Deciding: Addressing the Roberts Court's Shrinking Docket

Mary Margaret Meg Penrose

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

I have expressed the view-and it may be a view that I'll have to be educated on further if I am confirmed, and I am not stating it as a solid view.I do think there is room for the Court to take more cases.They hear about half the number of cases they did 25 years ago.There may be good reasons for that that I will learn if I am confirmed, but just looking at it from the outside, I think they could contribute more to the clarity and uniformity of the law by taking more cases.1 -Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. I. THE PROBLEM: THE DUTY TO DECIDE "The duty to decide is the primary judicial duty." 2 If one agrees with Judge Posner, then the Roberts Court is shirking its primary duty.Empirically, the Roberts Court is the least productive of any Supreme Court.3 It averages less than

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I have expressed the view-and it may be a view that I'll have to be educated on further if I am confirmed, and I am not stating it as a solid view.I do think there is room for the Court to take more cases.They hear about half the number of cases they did 25 years ago.There may be good reasons for that that I will learn if I am confirmed, but just looking at it from the outside, I think they could contribute more to the clarity and uniformity of the law by taking more cases.1 -Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. I. THE PROBLEM: THE DUTY TO DECIDE "The duty to decide is the primary judicial duty." 2 If one agrees with Judge Posner, then the Roberts Court is shirking its primary duty.Empirically, the Roberts Court is the least productive of any Supreme Court.3 It averages less than

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I have expressed the view-and it may be a view that I'll have to be educated on further if I am confirmed, and I am not stating it as a solid view.I do think there is room for the Court to take more cases.They hear about half the number of cases they did 25 years ago.There may be good reasons for that that I will learn if I am confirmed, but just looking at it from the outside, I think they could contribute more to the clarity and uniformity of the law by taking more cases.1 -Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. I. THE PROBLEM: THE DUTY TO DECIDE "The duty to decide is the primary judicial duty." 2 If one agrees with Judge Posner, then the Roberts Court is shirking its primary duty.Empirically, the Roberts Court is the least productive of any Supreme Court.3 It averages less than

Key concepts: Resizing, Computer network, Computer science, Law, Computer security, Political science, Business, European union

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Overwriting and Under-Deciding: Addressing the Roberts Court's Shrinking Docket — Research Paper | ScholarLens