2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Philosophical Issues in International Environmental Law

James W. Nickel, Daniel Barstow Magraw

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The philosophy of environmental law overlaps considerably with philosophical work in environmental ethics. For example, whether species and ecosystems have intrinsic value (in addition to instrumental value) is an issue in both environmental ethics and the philosophy of environmental law. This chapter addresses philosophical issues about international environmental law (IEL) in the three sections which follow. It reflects on the demand of IEL that the world&s;s governments and other actor&s;s seriously take into account the interests of future generations when they decide issues involving resources and pollution. The chapter considers philosophical issues about value raised by the requirements of IEL that species and ecosystems be protected. It also addresses IEL&s;s attempt to promote measures that mitigate climate change. The goal is to show that the philosophical questions raised by IEL are interesting, connected to practice, and worth thinking about.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The philosophy of environmental law overlaps considerably with philosophical work in environmental ethics. For example, whether species and ecosystems have intrinsic value (in addition to instrumental value) is an issue in both environmental ethics and the philosophy of environmental law. This chapter addresses philosophical issues about international environmental law (IEL) in the three sections which follow. It reflects on the demand of IEL that the world&s;s governments and other actor&s;s seriously take into account the interests of future generations when they decide issues involving resources and pollution. The chapter considers philosophical issues about value raised by the requirements of IEL that species and ecosystems be protected. It also addresses IEL&s;s attempt to promote measures that mitigate climate change. The goal is to show that the philosophical questions raised by IEL are interesting, connected to practice, and worth thinking about.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The philosophy of environmental law overlaps considerably with philosophical work in environmental ethics. For example, whether species and ecosystems have intrinsic value (in addition to instrumental value) is an issue in both environmental ethics and the philosophy of environmental law. This chapter addresses philosophical issues about international environmental law (IEL) in the three sections which follow. It reflects on the demand of IEL that the world&s;s governments and other actor&s;s seriously take into account the interests of future generations when they decide issues involving resources and pollution. The chapter considers philosophical issues about value raised by the requirements of IEL that species and ecosystems be protected. It also addresses IEL&s;s attempt to promote measures that mitigate climate change. The goal is to show that the philosophical questions raised by IEL are interesting, connected to practice, and worth thinking about.

Key concepts: Environmental law, Law, Political science, Environmental ethics, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Philosophical Issues in International Environmental Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens