Philosophical Issues in International Environmental Law
James W. Nickel, Daniel Barstow Magraw
Abstract
James W. Nickel, Daniel Barstow Magraw
Abstract
The philosophy of environmental law overlaps considerably with philosophical work in environmental ethics. For example, whether species and ecosystems have intrinsic value (in addition to instrumental value) is an issue in both environmental ethics and the philosophy of environmental law. This chapter addresses philosophical issues about international environmental law (IEL) in the three sections which follow. It reflects on the demand of IEL that the world&s;s governments and other actor&s;s seriously take into account the interests of future generations when they decide issues involving resources and pollution. The chapter considers philosophical issues about value raised by the requirements of IEL that species and ecosystems be protected. It also addresses IEL&s;s attempt to promote measures that mitigate climate change. The goal is to show that the philosophical questions raised by IEL are interesting, connected to practice, and worth thinking about.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The philosophy of environmental law overlaps considerably with philosophical work in environmental ethics. For example, whether species and ecosystems have intrinsic value (in addition to instrumental value) is an issue in both environmental ethics and the philosophy of environmental law. This chapter addresses philosophical issues about international environmental law (IEL) in the three sections which follow. It reflects on the demand of IEL that the world&s;s governments and other actor&s;s seriously take into account the interests of future generations when they decide issues involving resources and pollution. The chapter considers philosophical issues about value raised by the requirements of IEL that species and ecosystems be protected. It also addresses IEL&s;s attempt to promote measures that mitigate climate change. The goal is to show that the philosophical questions raised by IEL are interesting, connected to practice, and worth thinking about.
Key concepts: Environmental law, Law, Political science, Environmental ethics, Philosophy