Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year
Ahmed M. Hassan, Shukry G Mohammed
Abstract
Open-access reader
Ahmed M. Hassan, Shukry G Mohammed
Abstract
Open-access reader
AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the retention rate and pattern of different pit and fissure sealants placed on the occlusal surface of newly erupted first permanent molars after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: = 10) according to the type of the sealant. The four permanent first molars of each child were sealed. The sealant was applied according to the instructions from the manufacturer. A clinical evaluation was carried out at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The clinical observations were divided into three categories: total retention (TR), partial retention (PR), and total loss (TL). RESULTS: < 0.001). The glass carbomer sealant showed the least retention rate at all intervals. CONCLUSION: With an exception of the Ketac Molar Easymix, resin-based sealers performed better than glass ionomer-based sealers. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A proper application of pit and fissure sealant will decrease the chance for caries development in newly erupted teeth. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Hassan AM, Mohammed SG. Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(2):96-100.
OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the retention rate and pattern of different pit and fissure sealants placed on the occlusal surface of newly erupted first permanent molars after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: = 10) according to the type of the sealant. The four permanent first molars of each child were sealed. The sealant was applied according to the instructions from the manufacturer. A clinical evaluation was carried out at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The clinical observations were divided into three categories: total retention (TR), partial retention (PR), and total loss (TL). RESULTS: < 0.001). The glass carbomer sealant showed the least retention rate at all intervals. CONCLUSION: With an exception of the Ketac Molar Easymix, resin-based sealers performed better than glass ionomer-based sealers. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A proper application of pit and fissure sealant will decrease the chance for caries development in newly erupted teeth. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Hassan AM, Mohammed SG. Effectiveness of Seven Types of Sealants: Retention after One Year. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(2):96-100.
Key concepts: Sealant, Medicine, Molar, Dentistry, Retention rate, Glass ionomer cement, Significant difference, Orthodontics