On the reality of Hawking radiation
Asghar Qadir
Abstract
Asghar Qadir
Abstract
Hawking radiation caught the imagination of the public and physicists alike, because it seemed so counter-intuitive. By their very definition, black holes were supposed to endlessly absorb, but never emit, matter and energy. Yet, Hawking argued that taking Quantum Theory into account, they would radiate. The further belief was that Bekenstein and Hawking had developed the field of Black Hole Thermodynamics. Here I want to correct this impression and give due credit to Roger Penrose for founding the subject. Further, I discuss the question of whether Hawking radiation should be expected to really exist, arguing that there is reason to doubt it.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Hawking radiation caught the imagination of the public and physicists alike, because it seemed so counter-intuitive. By their very definition, black holes were supposed to endlessly absorb, but never emit, matter and energy. Yet, Hawking argued that taking Quantum Theory into account, they would radiate. The further belief was that Bekenstein and Hawking had developed the field of Black Hole Thermodynamics. Here I want to correct this impression and give due credit to Roger Penrose for founding the subject. Further, I discuss the question of whether Hawking radiation should be expected to really exist, arguing that there is reason to doubt it.
Key concepts: Hawking, Physics, Hawking radiation, Black hole information paradox, Theoretical physics, Black hole complementarity, Black hole (networking), Micro black hole