2018NORA - Norwegian Open Research ArchivesOpen access

How to Trade - An analysis of the WTO trade facilitation negotiations

Mildred Sandborg Mathisen

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This thesis analyses the negotiations that led to the adoption of the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) in the World Trade Organization (WTO). In 2013 members of the WTO adopted the first multilateral trade agreement since the WTO was established in 1995. The adoption of the agreement marked the end of 17 years of discussions, and nine years of negotiations. With the stagnation of the Doha round of negotiations as a backdrop, this thesis investigates how and why members were able to reach an agreement on trade facilitation. By investigating why the TFA was adopted, and why it was adopted in its specific form, this thesis challenges the conventional wisdom about the dynamics of negotiations within the WTO. Drawing on institutional theory, this thesis finds that the TFA was adopted because members wanted to reduce the collective action dilemmas associated with un-harmonized customs systems. Furthermore, the negotiations in the WTO affected how actors’ rated their options, which again affected the dynamics of the negotiations. Throughout the negotiations, members relied on the expertise and authority of other organizations within the trade facilitation field. The final agreement mirrors this reliance, as well as being the legacy of enduring political struggles for influence.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This thesis analyses the negotiations that led to the adoption of the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) in the World Trade Organization (WTO). In 2013 members of the WTO adopted the first multilateral trade agreement since the WTO was established in 1995. The adoption of the agreement marked the end of 17 years of discussions, and nine years of negotiations. With the stagnation of the Doha round of negotiations as a backdrop, this thesis investigates how and why members were able to reach an agreement on trade facilitation. By investigating why the TFA was adopted, and why it was adopted in its specific form, this thesis challenges the conventional wisdom about the dynamics of negotiations within the WTO. Drawing on institutional theory, this thesis finds that the TFA was adopted because members wanted to reduce the collective action dilemmas associated with un-harmonized customs systems. Furthermore, the negotiations in the WTO affected how actors’ rated their options, which again affected the dynamics of the negotiations. Throughout the negotiations, members relied on the expertise and authority of other organizations within the trade facilitation field. The final agreement mirrors this reliance, as well as being the legacy of enduring political struggles for influence.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This thesis analyses the negotiations that led to the adoption of the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) in the World Trade Organization (WTO). In 2013 members of the WTO adopted the first multilateral trade agreement since the WTO was established in 1995. The adoption of the agreement marked the end of 17 years of discussions, and nine years of negotiations. With the stagnation of the Doha round of negotiations as a backdrop, this thesis investigates how and why members were able to reach an agreement on trade facilitation. By investigating why the TFA was adopted, and why it was adopted in its specific form, this thesis challenges the conventional wisdom about the dynamics of negotiations within the WTO. Drawing on institutional theory, this thesis finds that the TFA was adopted because members wanted to reduce the collective action dilemmas associated with un-harmonized customs systems. Furthermore, the negotiations in the WTO affected how actors’ rated their options, which again affected the dynamics of the negotiations. Throughout the negotiations, members relied on the expertise and authority of other organizations within the trade facilitation field. The final agreement mirrors this reliance, as well as being the legacy of enduring political struggles for influence.

Key concepts: Trade facilitation, Negotiation, International trade, Facilitation, International economics, Business, Political science, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How to Trade - An analysis of the WTO trade facilitation negotiations — Research Paper | ScholarLens