2019•The Journal of the Civil War EraRequires access

Fighting for Reunion: Dilemmas of Hatred and Vengeance

George C. Rable

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

“Fighting for Reunion: Dilemmas of Hatred and Vengeance” examines a central paradox for supporters of the Union during the Civil War. Any war, including a civil war, inevitably generates hatred of the enemy and calls for vengeance. But reunion (which remained the central northern war aim) also made intense hatred of the Confederates problematic. During the war, northerners debated the nature and limits of hatred and vengeance. It was easy enough to claim that Confederates were the real haters or hope that religious convictions could control the problem. The goal of reunion at times tamped down expressions of hatred toward the Rebels even as many northerners expressed considerable partisan and racial hostility. But there was continuous disagreement over both the objects and legitimacy of hatred. The whole question of vengeance was equally divisive and unsettling. If the goal of the war was reconstruction of the Union and ultimately sectional reconciliation, the whole question of hatred and vengeance posed some serious dilemmas.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

“Fighting for Reunion: Dilemmas of Hatred and Vengeance” examines a central paradox for supporters of the Union during the Civil War. Any war, including a civil war, inevitably generates hatred of the enemy and calls for vengeance. But reunion (which remained the central northern war aim) also made intense hatred of the Confederates problematic. During the war, northerners debated the nature and limits of hatred and vengeance. It was easy enough to claim that Confederates were the real haters or hope that religious convictions could control the problem. The goal of reunion at times tamped down expressions of hatred toward the Rebels even as many northerners expressed considerable partisan and racial hostility. But there was continuous disagreement over both the objects and legitimacy of hatred. The whole question of vengeance was equally divisive and unsettling. If the goal of the war was reconstruction of the Union and ultimately sectional reconciliation, the whole question of hatred and vengeance posed some serious dilemmas.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

“Fighting for Reunion: Dilemmas of Hatred and Vengeance” examines a central paradox for supporters of the Union during the Civil War. Any war, including a civil war, inevitably generates hatred of the enemy and calls for vengeance. But reunion (which remained the central northern war aim) also made intense hatred of the Confederates problematic. During the war, northerners debated the nature and limits of hatred and vengeance. It was easy enough to claim that Confederates were the real haters or hope that religious convictions could control the problem. The goal of reunion at times tamped down expressions of hatred toward the Rebels even as many northerners expressed considerable partisan and racial hostility. But there was continuous disagreement over both the objects and legitimacy of hatred. The whole question of vengeance was equally divisive and unsettling. If the goal of the war was reconstruction of the Union and ultimately sectional reconciliation, the whole question of hatred and vengeance posed some serious dilemmas.

Key concepts: Hatred, Hostility, Spanish Civil War, Legitimacy, Political science, Adversary, Law, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fighting for Reunion: Dilemmas of Hatred and Vengeance — Research Paper | ScholarLens