2019Medical and Veterinary EntomologyRequires access

Activation of the ambusher tick Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) exposed to different stimuli

Viviane Zeringóta, Jaires Gomes de Oliveira Filho, Lígia Miranda Ferreira Borges

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Abstract The present study aimed to evaluate the behaviour of larvae of Rhipicephalus microplus exposed to different stimuli. A Y‐olfactometer was positioned vertically and R. microplus larvae were exposed to environmental air, CO 2 alone, N , N ‐diethyl‐3‐methylbenzamide (DEET) alone, and CO 2 combined with the repellents DEET and ( E )‐2‐octenal. Tests were also conducted with the olfactometer positioned horizontally; in this case, however, only CO 2 was tested. In all tests conducted with the Y‐olfactometer positioned vertically, CO 2 activated R. microplus larvae even in the presence of DEET and ( E )‐2‐octenal, although activation was lower when these repellents were used. In the absence of CO 2 , larval behaviour against DEET was similar to that of the larvae in the control group. In the tests performed with the olfactometer positioned horizontally, the larvae had no significant response to the presence of CO 2 . The larvae were not attracted to or repelled by any compound tested in either the vertical or horizontal position of the olfactometer. The lack of horizontal displacement, attraction or repellence may have been a result of the ambush behaviour of this tick species. However, when larvae were exposed to stimuli and the olfactometer was positioned vertically, the interference of attractant and repellent stimuli in larval behaviour was assessed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The present study aimed to evaluate the behaviour of larvae of Rhipicephalus microplus exposed to different stimuli. A Y‐olfactometer was positioned vertically and R. microplus larvae were exposed to environmental air, CO 2 alone, N , N ‐diethyl‐3‐methylbenzamide (DEET) alone, and CO 2 combined with the repellents DEET and ( E )‐2‐octenal. Tests were also conducted with the olfactometer positioned horizontally; in this case, however, only CO 2 was tested. In all tests conducted with the Y‐olfactometer positioned vertically, CO 2 activated R. microplus larvae even in the presence of DEET and ( E )‐2‐octenal, although activation was lower when these repellents were used. In the absence of CO 2 , larval behaviour against DEET was similar to that of the larvae in the control group. In the tests performed with the olfactometer positioned horizontally, the larvae had no significant response to the presence of CO 2 . The larvae were not attracted to or repelled by any compound tested in either the vertical or horizontal position of the olfactometer. The lack of horizontal displacement, attraction or repellence may have been a result of the ambush behaviour of this tick species. However, when larvae were exposed to stimuli and the olfactometer was positioned vertically, the interference of attractant and repellent stimuli in larval behaviour was assessed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The present study aimed to evaluate the behaviour of larvae of Rhipicephalus microplus exposed to different stimuli. A Y‐olfactometer was positioned vertically and R. microplus larvae were exposed to environmental air, CO 2 alone, N , N ‐diethyl‐3‐methylbenzamide (DEET) alone, and CO 2 combined with the repellents DEET and ( E )‐2‐octenal. Tests were also conducted with the olfactometer positioned horizontally; in this case, however, only CO 2 was tested. In all tests conducted with the Y‐olfactometer positioned vertically, CO 2 activated R. microplus larvae even in the presence of DEET and ( E )‐2‐octenal, although activation was lower when these repellents were used. In the absence of CO 2 , larval behaviour against DEET was similar to that of the larvae in the control group. In the tests performed with the olfactometer positioned horizontally, the larvae had no significant response to the presence of CO 2 . The larvae were not attracted to or repelled by any compound tested in either the vertical or horizontal position of the olfactometer. The lack of horizontal displacement, attraction or repellence may have been a result of the ambush behaviour of this tick species. However, when larvae were exposed to stimuli and the olfactometer was positioned vertically, the interference of attractant and repellent stimuli in larval behaviour was assessed.

Key concepts: Olfactometer, DEET, Ixodidae, Biology, Larva, Tick, Acari, Attraction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Activation of the ambusher tick Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) exposed to different stimuli — Research Paper | ScholarLens