2019Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University)Open access

The application of subjective ratings of perceived exertion to regulate exercise intensity during upper body exercise

Michael J. Hutchinson

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Exercise intensity can be measured using objective markers, such as oxygen uptake (V̇O2), heart rate (HR) and power output (PO), and with subjective markers such as Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE). During traditional exercise testing and prescription settings, intensity is typically regulated using objective markers. However, in both examples, RPE offers an enticing option as an alternative method. For exercise testing this comes through the use of a maximal perceptually-regulated exercise test (PRETmax), and in exercise prescription through utilising RPE-guided training. Though, despite the potential advantages of the PRETmax and RPE-guided training, little evidence exists as to the application of these methods during upper body exercise (UBE). For able-bodied (AB) individuals, UBE provides an alternative to more common lower body forms of exercise, whilst for individuals with a disability affecting the lower limbs, UBE is the predominant form of both daily mobility and exercise. Therefore, in order to inform practice surrounding UBE testing and prescription, it is essential to understand more about the application of RPE. [Continues.]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Exercise intensity can be measured using objective markers, such as oxygen uptake (V̇O2), heart rate (HR) and power output (PO), and with subjective markers such as Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE). During traditional exercise testing and prescription settings, intensity is typically regulated using objective markers. However, in both examples, RPE offers an enticing option as an alternative method. For exercise testing this comes through the use of a maximal perceptually-regulated exercise test (PRETmax), and in exercise prescription through utilising RPE-guided training. Though, despite the potential advantages of the PRETmax and RPE-guided training, little evidence exists as to the application of these methods during upper body exercise (UBE). For able-bodied (AB) individuals, UBE provides an alternative to more common lower body forms of exercise, whilst for individuals with a disability affecting the lower limbs, UBE is the predominant form of both daily mobility and exercise. Therefore, in order to inform practice surrounding UBE testing and prescription, it is essential to understand more about the application of RPE. [Continues.]

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Exercise intensity can be measured using objective markers, such as oxygen uptake (V̇O2), heart rate (HR) and power output (PO), and with subjective markers such as Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE). During traditional exercise testing and prescription settings, intensity is typically regulated using objective markers. However, in both examples, RPE offers an enticing option as an alternative method. For exercise testing this comes through the use of a maximal perceptually-regulated exercise test (PRETmax), and in exercise prescription through utilising RPE-guided training. Though, despite the potential advantages of the PRETmax and RPE-guided training, little evidence exists as to the application of these methods during upper body exercise (UBE). For able-bodied (AB) individuals, UBE provides an alternative to more common lower body forms of exercise, whilst for individuals with a disability affecting the lower limbs, UBE is the predominant form of both daily mobility and exercise. Therefore, in order to inform practice surrounding UBE testing and prescription, it is essential to understand more about the application of RPE. [Continues.]

Key concepts: Exercise prescription, Exercise intensity, Perceived exertion, Physical therapy, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Medical prescription, Exertion, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The application of subjective ratings of perceived exertion to regulate exercise intensity during upper body exercise — Research Paper | ScholarLens