2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Berlin’s negative freedom and the conceptual work of the boundaries of liberty

Maria Dimova‐Cookson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Berlin’s negative freedom is a conceptual masterpiece, even if imperfect. Berlin defines negative freedom not only as against positive freedom, but also as against other values. In fact, the arguments distinguishing negative freedom from positive and those distinguishing it from other values are very similar. Berlin’s most famous definition of negative freedom is that of ‘non-interference’. Negative freedom, he repeatedly states, should be understood as ‘liberty from ’, as ‘absence of interference’, as lack of ‘deliberate interference of other human beings’. Berlin believes that socioeconomic conditions should not play a part in defining the meaning of negative liberty. Political negative freedom is the freedom concept which leading strands of contemporary political theory such as republicanism and the capability approach aim to articulate. It represents the freedom which political institutions should ideally guarantee.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Berlin’s negative freedom is a conceptual masterpiece, even if imperfect. Berlin defines negative freedom not only as against positive freedom, but also as against other values. In fact, the arguments distinguishing negative freedom from positive and those distinguishing it from other values are very similar. Berlin’s most famous definition of negative freedom is that of ‘non-interference’. Negative freedom, he repeatedly states, should be understood as ‘liberty from ’, as ‘absence of interference’, as lack of ‘deliberate interference of other human beings’. Berlin believes that socioeconomic conditions should not play a part in defining the meaning of negative liberty. Political negative freedom is the freedom concept which leading strands of contemporary political theory such as republicanism and the capability approach aim to articulate. It represents the freedom which political institutions should ideally guarantee.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Berlin’s negative freedom is a conceptual masterpiece, even if imperfect. Berlin defines negative freedom not only as against positive freedom, but also as against other values. In fact, the arguments distinguishing negative freedom from positive and those distinguishing it from other values are very similar. Berlin’s most famous definition of negative freedom is that of ‘non-interference’. Negative freedom, he repeatedly states, should be understood as ‘liberty from ’, as ‘absence of interference’, as lack of ‘deliberate interference of other human beings’. Berlin believes that socioeconomic conditions should not play a part in defining the meaning of negative liberty. Political negative freedom is the freedom concept which leading strands of contemporary political theory such as republicanism and the capability approach aim to articulate. It represents the freedom which political institutions should ideally guarantee.

Key concepts: Work (physics), Sociology, Political science, Epistemology, Philosophy, Engineering, Mechanical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Berlin’s negative freedom and the conceptual work of the boundaries of liberty — Research Paper | ScholarLens