Civil Liberties and War
Adam J. Berinsky
Abstract
Adam J. Berinsky
Abstract
In the days and weeks after 9/11, some worried that the government's offensive against terrorist activity might undermine the democratic foundations of American society. To address this concern, a number of scholars and media organizations conducted in-depth investigations of America's commitment to civil liberties and political tolerance in late 2001. On the whole, public support for the protection of civil liberties was lower than it had been before the attacks. On the other hand, aggregate support for measures designed to preserve civil liberties remained strong. This chapter shows that civil liberties judgments during times of war differ in their depth and scope—not in their structure—from civil liberties judgments during times of peace. By looking to the same kinds of processes that motivate judgments concerning domestic politics, we can understand the nature of public opinion during war. This chapter also shows that threat and, in some cases, group attachments and enmities, structured civil liberties judgments during World War II, the Vietnam War, and the present day.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the days and weeks after 9/11, some worried that the government's offensive against terrorist activity might undermine the democratic foundations of American society. To address this concern, a number of scholars and media organizations conducted in-depth investigations of America's commitment to civil liberties and political tolerance in late 2001. On the whole, public support for the protection of civil liberties was lower than it had been before the attacks. On the other hand, aggregate support for measures designed to preserve civil liberties remained strong. This chapter shows that civil liberties judgments during times of war differ in their depth and scope—not in their structure—from civil liberties judgments during times of peace. By looking to the same kinds of processes that motivate judgments concerning domestic politics, we can understand the nature of public opinion during war. This chapter also shows that threat and, in some cases, group attachments and enmities, structured civil liberties judgments during World War II, the Vietnam War, and the present day.
Key concepts: Civil liberties, Spanish Civil War, Law, Terrorism, Democracy, Politics, Political science, Offensive