2019Journal of Esthetic and Restorative DentistryRequires access

Can universal adhesive systems bond to zirconia?

Ricardo Alves dos Santos, Eliane Alves de Lima, Luciana Sarmento de Mendonça, J. E. de Oliveira, Ariela Vilela Rizuto, Áurea Fernanda de Araújo Silva Tavares, Rodivan Braz da Silva

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the bond strength to zirconia subjected to different surface treatments of universal bonding agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty blocks of zirconia were obtained by CAD/CAM milling. The blocks were embedded into PVC tubes, polished sequentially with increasing granulation sandpapers and divided into two groups according to surface treatment: polished or grit-blasted with alumina particles. Each group was then subdivided by bonding agent employed: Z-Prime Plus (control); Scotchbond Universal; All Bond Universal; and Z-Prime Plus + All Bond Universal. Cylindrical composite resin build-ups were constructed atop the blocks using a two-part metal die. Specimens were stored for 24 hours and subjected to microshear bond strength testing. Statistical analyses were performed by means of the F-test (ANOVA), Student's t and Tukey's test. After sputter coating, zirconia surfaces and adhesive interfaces were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: Bond strength was superior for grit-blasted zirconia. In specimens with this surface treatment, there were no significant differences between experimental groups. On SEM, blasted surfaces exhibited areas of micromechanical retention and adhesive interfaces exhibited areas of zirconia-adhesive interlocking. CONCLUSION: Universal adhesive systems were able to bond to zirconia. The interlocking promoted by grit-blasting enhanced bond strength. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Universal adhesive systems simplify bonding to zirconia and enable intraoral repair of fractures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To measure the bond strength to zirconia subjected to different surface treatments of universal bonding agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty blocks of zirconia were obtained by CAD/CAM milling. The blocks were embedded into PVC tubes, polished sequentially with increasing granulation sandpapers and divided into two groups according to surface treatment: polished or grit-blasted with alumina particles. Each group was then subdivided by bonding agent employed: Z-Prime Plus (control); Scotchbond Universal; All Bond Universal; and Z-Prime Plus + All Bond Universal. Cylindrical composite resin build-ups were constructed atop the blocks using a two-part metal die. Specimens were stored for 24 hours and subjected to microshear bond strength testing. Statistical analyses were performed by means of the F-test (ANOVA), Student's t and Tukey's test. After sputter coating, zirconia surfaces and adhesive interfaces were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: Bond strength was superior for grit-blasted zirconia. In specimens with this surface treatment, there were no significant differences between experimental groups. On SEM, blasted surfaces exhibited areas of micromechanical retention and adhesive interfaces exhibited areas of zirconia-adhesive interlocking. CONCLUSION: Universal adhesive systems were able to bond to zirconia. The interlocking promoted by grit-blasting enhanced bond strength. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Universal adhesive systems simplify bonding to zirconia and enable intraoral repair of fractures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the bond strength to zirconia subjected to different surface treatments of universal bonding agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty blocks of zirconia were obtained by CAD/CAM milling. The blocks were embedded into PVC tubes, polished sequentially with increasing granulation sandpapers and divided into two groups according to surface treatment: polished or grit-blasted with alumina particles. Each group was then subdivided by bonding agent employed: Z-Prime Plus (control); Scotchbond Universal; All Bond Universal; and Z-Prime Plus + All Bond Universal. Cylindrical composite resin build-ups were constructed atop the blocks using a two-part metal die. Specimens were stored for 24 hours and subjected to microshear bond strength testing. Statistical analyses were performed by means of the F-test (ANOVA), Student's t and Tukey's test. After sputter coating, zirconia surfaces and adhesive interfaces were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: Bond strength was superior for grit-blasted zirconia. In specimens with this surface treatment, there were no significant differences between experimental groups. On SEM, blasted surfaces exhibited areas of micromechanical retention and adhesive interfaces exhibited areas of zirconia-adhesive interlocking. CONCLUSION: Universal adhesive systems were able to bond to zirconia. The interlocking promoted by grit-blasting enhanced bond strength. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Universal adhesive systems simplify bonding to zirconia and enable intraoral repair of fractures.

Key concepts: Cubic zirconia, Universal testing machine, Materials science, Adhesive, Bond strength, Composite material, Composite number, Tukey's range test

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Can universal adhesive systems bond to zirconia? — Research Paper | ScholarLens