2019•Journal of Spatial ScienceRequires access

Absolute radiometric calibration and validation of a UAV multispectral sensor: a comparison between the irradiance-based method and reflectance-based method

Wei Chen, Hengyang Wang

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Through an unmanned vehicle payload calibration campaign experiments, both reflectance-based and irradiance-based methods are used to calibrate multispectral sensor. The results show that both methods achieved good linear relationships between the digital numbers and apparent radiances (R2 > 0.99). Validation results demonstrated the relative error between the radiometric calibration and radiative transfer calculation ranged from 0.91% to 21.05%. The error analysis suggested that the irradiance-based method is less sensitive to aerosol parameters. However, the relative differences between these two methods are small under low aerosol loading conditions, suggesting the irradiance-based method may be a good option with some improvements.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Through an unmanned vehicle payload calibration campaign experiments, both reflectance-based and irradiance-based methods are used to calibrate multispectral sensor. The results show that both methods achieved good linear relationships between the digital numbers and apparent radiances (R2 > 0.99). Validation results demonstrated the relative error between the radiometric calibration and radiative transfer calculation ranged from 0.91% to 21.05%. The error analysis suggested that the irradiance-based method is less sensitive to aerosol parameters. However, the relative differences between these two methods are small under low aerosol loading conditions, suggesting the irradiance-based method may be a good option with some improvements.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Through an unmanned vehicle payload calibration campaign experiments, both reflectance-based and irradiance-based methods are used to calibrate multispectral sensor. The results show that both methods achieved good linear relationships between the digital numbers and apparent radiances (R2 > 0.99). Validation results demonstrated the relative error between the radiometric calibration and radiative transfer calculation ranged from 0.91% to 21.05%. The error analysis suggested that the irradiance-based method is less sensitive to aerosol parameters. However, the relative differences between these two methods are small under low aerosol loading conditions, suggesting the irradiance-based method may be a good option with some improvements.

Key concepts: Irradiance, Remote sensing, Multispectral image, Radiometric calibration, Calibration, Environmental science, Radiance, Spectroradiometer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Absolute radiometric calibration and validation of a UAV multispectral sensor: a comparison between the irradiance-based method and reflectance-based method — Research Paper | ScholarLens