2019•Practice Periodical on Structural Design and ConstructionRequires access

Construction Safety Culture and Climate: Satisfying Necessity for an Industry Framework

Ahmed Jalil Al-Bayati, Alex Albert, George B. Ford

Open publisher page 59 citations

Abstract

Much of the construction literature that examines safety culture and safety climate ignores the unique characteristics of construction workplaces. Therefore, existing safety culture and climate models do not capture the true nature of construction practices where the upper management, such as project managers and safety coordinators, often manage several construction projects. Accordingly, a framework that addresses the contribution of the management personnel as well as the site-level personnel has been presented as part of the current research. The proposed framework captures safety culture and safety climate using the following two distinct factors: (1) the management safety (MS) factor and (2) the site safety (SS) factor. A survey was administered to collect the perceptions of construction practitioners and site personnel regarding the suggested variables of the MS and SS factors. In addition, the experience modification rate (EMR) was collected to assess the relation between the suggested model and the overall safety performance. The results obtained provide support for the proposed model by suggesting that the MS factor significantly influences the SS factor and that the two factors are negatively associated with the EMRs of the participating organizations. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the MS factor represents the construction safety culture and the SS represents the construction safety climate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Much of the construction literature that examines safety culture and safety climate ignores the unique characteristics of construction workplaces. Therefore, existing safety culture and climate models do not capture the true nature of construction practices where the upper management, such as project managers and safety coordinators, often manage several construction projects. Accordingly, a framework that addresses the contribution of the management personnel as well as the site-level personnel has been presented as part of the current research. The proposed framework captures safety culture and safety climate using the following two distinct factors: (1) the management safety (MS) factor and (2) the site safety (SS) factor. A survey was administered to collect the perceptions of construction practitioners and site personnel regarding the suggested variables of the MS and SS factors. In addition, the experience modification rate (EMR) was collected to assess the relation between the suggested model and the overall safety performance. The results obtained provide support for the proposed model by suggesting that the MS factor significantly influences the SS factor and that the two factors are negatively associated with the EMRs of the participating organizations. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the MS factor represents the construction safety culture and the SS represents the construction safety climate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Much of the construction literature that examines safety culture and safety climate ignores the unique characteristics of construction workplaces. Therefore, existing safety culture and climate models do not capture the true nature of construction practices where the upper management, such as project managers and safety coordinators, often manage several construction projects. Accordingly, a framework that addresses the contribution of the management personnel as well as the site-level personnel has been presented as part of the current research. The proposed framework captures safety culture and safety climate using the following two distinct factors: (1) the management safety (MS) factor and (2) the site safety (SS) factor. A survey was administered to collect the perceptions of construction practitioners and site personnel regarding the suggested variables of the MS and SS factors. In addition, the experience modification rate (EMR) was collected to assess the relation between the suggested model and the overall safety performance. The results obtained provide support for the proposed model by suggesting that the MS factor significantly influences the SS factor and that the two factors are negatively associated with the EMRs of the participating organizations. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the MS factor represents the construction safety culture and the SS represents the construction safety climate.

Key concepts: Safety culture, Safety climate, Organizational culture, Construction industry, Business, Construction site safety, Occupational safety and health, Environmental resource management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Construction Safety Culture and Climate: Satisfying Necessity for an Industry Framework — Research Paper | ScholarLens