2019Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)Open access

Small and rural public libraries: Supporting community health and wellness

Noah Lenstra, Ellen L. Rubenstein, Christine D’Arpa, Susan K. Burke

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Distance from metropolitan areas has been found to correlate with health outcomes, with rural areas rating the worst in national health rankings. Rural residents are less likely to have easy access to health professionals, with 77.2% of rural counties in the U.S. in “health professional shortage areas” (ALA, 2017). While public libraries do not typically provide health care (with some exceptions), they do commonly assist patrons in finding health information. Because libraries are often the most valued organizations in their communities (Pew Research Center, 2013) as a resource available to all and used by many, they are well positioned to address health and wellness needs through public programs. Small and rural libraries are often staffed by non-MLIS librarians, have fewer resources to support training and networking, and staff may be unaware of best practices related to health and wellness programming. In order to increase opportunities and education for staff in these libraries it is crucial to understand how public library staff currently develop, deliver, and assess these programs. This research examines how small and rural public libraries support community health and wellness through public programs, and seeks to: • Obtain an in-depth understanding of health and wellness programs in small and rural public libraries • Learn how libraries collaborate with outside organizations to provide such programs and how public library staff view their roles and responsibilities in offering them • Learn the perspectives of outside collaborators who partner with libraries • Understand the perspectives of patrons who use or do not use library programs for health and wellness information and lifelong learning This research will comprise at least 16 case studies of library systems and individual public libraries in small and/or rural areas in Michigan, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Vermont. Four individual libraries from each state will be studied, and, where applicable, their library systems, enabling comparisons across different regions of the country with variations in state health profiles and state-level library infrastructures. The study will result in an educational model that will 1) teach librarians and other library staff how to effectively develop, assess, sustain, and extend programming and services; 2) inform library practices and LIS pedagogies; and 3) inform potential partners how to work with small and rural libraries to develop and implement health and wellness programs. The researchers will also develop training modules for LIS educators and students in collaboration with partners in the four state libraries that will include information about best practices for funding, partnering, planning, advertising, and assessing health and wellness programming.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Distance from metropolitan areas has been found to correlate with health outcomes, with rural areas rating the worst in national health rankings. Rural residents are less likely to have easy access to health professionals, with 77.2% of rural counties in the U.S. in “health professional shortage areas” (ALA, 2017). While public libraries do not typically provide health care (with some exceptions), they do commonly assist patrons in finding health information. Because libraries are often the most valued organizations in their communities (Pew Research Center, 2013) as a resource available to all and used by many, they are well positioned to address health and wellness needs through public programs. Small and rural libraries are often staffed by non-MLIS librarians, have fewer resources to support training and networking, and staff may be unaware of best practices related to health and wellness programming. In order to increase opportunities and education for staff in these libraries it is crucial to understand how public library staff currently develop, deliver, and assess these programs. This research examines how small and rural public libraries support community health and wellness through public programs, and seeks to: • Obtain an in-depth understanding of health and wellness programs in small and rural public libraries • Learn how libraries collaborate with outside organizations to provide such programs and how public library staff view their roles and responsibilities in offering them • Learn the perspectives of outside collaborators who partner with libraries • Understand the perspectives of patrons who use or do not use library programs for health and wellness information and lifelong learning This research will comprise at least 16 case studies of library systems and individual public libraries in small and/or rural areas in Michigan, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Vermont. Four individual libraries from each state will be studied, and, where applicable, their library systems, enabling comparisons across different regions of the country with variations in state health profiles and state-level library infrastructures. The study will result in an educational model that will 1) teach librarians and other library staff how to effectively develop, assess, sustain, and extend programming and services; 2) inform library practices and LIS pedagogies; and 3) inform potential partners how to work with small and rural libraries to develop and implement health and wellness programs. The researchers will also develop training modules for LIS educators and students in collaboration with partners in the four state libraries that will include information about best practices for funding, partnering, planning, advertising, and assessing health and wellness programming.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Distance from metropolitan areas has been found to correlate with health outcomes, with rural areas rating the worst in national health rankings. Rural residents are less likely to have easy access to health professionals, with 77.2% of rural counties in the U.S. in “health professional shortage areas” (ALA, 2017). While public libraries do not typically provide health care (with some exceptions), they do commonly assist patrons in finding health information. Because libraries are often the most valued organizations in their communities (Pew Research Center, 2013) as a resource available to all and used by many, they are well positioned to address health and wellness needs through public programs. Small and rural libraries are often staffed by non-MLIS librarians, have fewer resources to support training and networking, and staff may be unaware of best practices related to health and wellness programming. In order to increase opportunities and education for staff in these libraries it is crucial to understand how public library staff currently develop, deliver, and assess these programs. This research examines how small and rural public libraries support community health and wellness through public programs, and seeks to: • Obtain an in-depth understanding of health and wellness programs in small and rural public libraries • Learn how libraries collaborate with outside organizations to provide such programs and how public library staff view their roles and responsibilities in offering them • Learn the perspectives of outside collaborators who partner with libraries • Understand the perspectives of patrons who use or do not use library programs for health and wellness information and lifelong learning This research will comprise at least 16 case studies of library systems and individual public libraries in small and/or rural areas in Michigan, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Vermont. Four individual libraries from each state will be studied, and, where applicable, their library systems, enabling comparisons across different regions of the country with variations in state health profiles and state-level library infrastructures. The study will result in an educational model that will 1) teach librarians and other library staff how to effectively develop, assess, sustain, and extend programming and services; 2) inform library practices and LIS pedagogies; and 3) inform potential partners how to work with small and rural libraries to develop and implement health and wellness programs. The researchers will also develop training modules for LIS educators and students in collaboration with partners in the four state libraries that will include information about best practices for funding, partnering, planning, advertising, and assessing health and wellness programming.

Key concepts: Public health, Public relations, Business, Political science, Medicine, Nursing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Small and rural public libraries: Supporting community health and wellness — Research Paper | ScholarLens