2019•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

'The More Things Change, The More They Remain the Same:' Lawyer Ethics in the 21st Century

Gregory C. Sisk

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

At an accelerating pace since the recession, our legal profession has been undergoing structural changes in the delivery of many legal services. At the same time, longstanding principles of ethics continue to govern the day-to-day lives of practicing lawyers. This essay lays out four examples of how meaningful change in lawyer practice has been accompanied since the turn-of-the-century with continued adherence to bedrock professional concepts. First, the rules now embrace the multi-jurisdictional practice of law, while the disciplinary authority of each jurisdiction is emphatically confirmed and strengthened. Second, rules on lawyer advertising are streamlined to grant largely open-ended permission for lawyers to communicate about legal services, while direct solicitation of clients by lawyers remains strictly prohibited. Third, new exceptions to the confidentiality rule permit (and perhaps require) disclosures to prevent and mitigate financial harm, but confined to circumstances where the lawyer’s legal services were abused and thus largely parallel to the longstanding crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege. Finally, proposals to allow lawyers to engage in multi-disciplinary practice have faltered again and again, and, in any event, have typically been modest in ensuring that ultimate control of entities engaged in legal practice be reserved to lawyers. In sum, while rules of professional conduct are not static and are constantly under evolutionary revision, the foundational concepts of lawyer ethics remain deeply-rooted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

At an accelerating pace since the recession, our legal profession has been undergoing structural changes in the delivery of many legal services. At the same time, longstanding principles of ethics continue to govern the day-to-day lives of practicing lawyers. This essay lays out four examples of how meaningful change in lawyer practice has been accompanied since the turn-of-the-century with continued adherence to bedrock professional concepts. First, the rules now embrace the multi-jurisdictional practice of law, while the disciplinary authority of each jurisdiction is emphatically confirmed and strengthened. Second, rules on lawyer advertising are streamlined to grant largely open-ended permission for lawyers to communicate about legal services, while direct solicitation of clients by lawyers remains strictly prohibited. Third, new exceptions to the confidentiality rule permit (and perhaps require) disclosures to prevent and mitigate financial harm, but confined to circumstances where the lawyer’s legal services were abused and thus largely parallel to the longstanding crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege. Finally, proposals to allow lawyers to engage in multi-disciplinary practice have faltered again and again, and, in any event, have typically been modest in ensuring that ultimate control of entities engaged in legal practice be reserved to lawyers. In sum, while rules of professional conduct are not static and are constantly under evolutionary revision, the foundational concepts of lawyer ethics remain deeply-rooted.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

At an accelerating pace since the recession, our legal profession has been undergoing structural changes in the delivery of many legal services. At the same time, longstanding principles of ethics continue to govern the day-to-day lives of practicing lawyers. This essay lays out four examples of how meaningful change in lawyer practice has been accompanied since the turn-of-the-century with continued adherence to bedrock professional concepts. First, the rules now embrace the multi-jurisdictional practice of law, while the disciplinary authority of each jurisdiction is emphatically confirmed and strengthened. Second, rules on lawyer advertising are streamlined to grant largely open-ended permission for lawyers to communicate about legal services, while direct solicitation of clients by lawyers remains strictly prohibited. Third, new exceptions to the confidentiality rule permit (and perhaps require) disclosures to prevent and mitigate financial harm, but confined to circumstances where the lawyer’s legal services were abused and thus largely parallel to the longstanding crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege. Finally, proposals to allow lawyers to engage in multi-disciplinary practice have faltered again and again, and, in any event, have typically been modest in ensuring that ultimate control of entities engaged in legal practice be reserved to lawyers. In sum, while rules of professional conduct are not static and are constantly under evolutionary revision, the foundational concepts of lawyer ethics remain deeply-rooted.

Key concepts: Legal ethics, Professional conduct, Practice of law, Law, Legal profession, Harm, Jurisdiction, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
'The More Things Change, The More They Remain the Same:' Lawyer Ethics in the 21st Century — Research Paper | ScholarLens