Use of Stand Density Index as an Alternative to Stocking Percent in Upland Hardwoods
Roger A. Williams
Abstract
Roger A. Williams
Abstract
Abstract Stand Density Index (SDI) equations were developed and presented for upland hardwoods in southern Ohio. The relationship between SDI and stocking percent from upland hardwood stocking charts were developed, and a diagram displaying this relationship is presented. Critical stand density boundaries equivalent to stocking percent on stocking charts were defined: (1) the C-level of stocking (SDI < 125), (2) the B-level of stocking (125 ≤ SDI < 215), and (3) the A-level of stocking (215 ≤ SDI < 250). A fourth boundary—the region where competition-induced mortality begins—was determined through empirical evidence at an SDI = 175, or 81% stocking. How these boundaries can be utilized in various management strategies is presented. North. J. Appl. For. 20(3):137–142.
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Stand Density Index (SDI) equations were developed and presented for upland hardwoods in southern Ohio. The relationship between SDI and stocking percent from upland hardwood stocking charts were developed, and a diagram displaying this relationship is presented. Critical stand density boundaries equivalent to stocking percent on stocking charts were defined: (1) the C-level of stocking (SDI < 125), (2) the B-level of stocking (125 ≤ SDI < 215), and (3) the A-level of stocking (215 ≤ SDI < 250). A fourth boundary—the region where competition-induced mortality begins—was determined through empirical evidence at an SDI = 175, or 81% stocking. How these boundaries can be utilized in various management strategies is presented. North. J. Appl. For. 20(3):137–142.
Key concepts: Stocking, Hardwood, Forestry, Index (typography), Environmental science, Geography, Mathematics, Agroforestry