2016Unpublished venueOpen access

Static and Dynamic Analysis for Android Malware Detection

Ankita Kapratwar

Open full text 17 citations

Abstract

Static analysis relies on features extracted without executing code, while dynamic analysis extracts features based on code execution (or emulation). In general, static analysis is more e cient, while static analysis is often more informative, particularly in cases of highly obfuscated code. Static analysis of an Android application can rely on features extracted from the manifest le or the Java bytecode, while dynamic analysis of Android applications can deal with features involving dynamic code loading and system calls that are collected while the application is running. In this research, we analyzed the e ectiveness of combining static and dynamic features for detecting Android malware using machine learning techniques . We also carefully analyze the robustness of our scoring technique.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Static analysis relies on features extracted without executing code, while dynamic analysis extracts features based on code execution (or emulation). In general, static analysis is more e cient, while static analysis is often more informative, particularly in cases of highly obfuscated code. Static analysis of an Android application can rely on features extracted from the manifest le or the Java bytecode, while dynamic analysis of Android applications can deal with features involving dynamic code loading and system calls that are collected while the application is running. In this research, we analyzed the e ectiveness of combining static and dynamic features for detecting Android malware using machine learning techniques . We also carefully analyze the robustness of our scoring technique.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Static analysis relies on features extracted without executing code, while dynamic analysis extracts features based on code execution (or emulation). In general, static analysis is more e cient, while static analysis is often more informative, particularly in cases of highly obfuscated code. Static analysis of an Android application can rely on features extracted from the manifest le or the Java bytecode, while dynamic analysis of Android applications can deal with features involving dynamic code loading and system calls that are collected while the application is running. In this research, we analyzed the e ectiveness of combining static and dynamic features for detecting Android malware using machine learning techniques . We also carefully analyze the robustness of our scoring technique.

Key concepts: Bytecode, Static analysis, Computer science, Emulation, Android (operating system), Machine code, Static program analysis, Dynamic program analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Static and Dynamic Analysis for Android Malware Detection — Research Paper | ScholarLens