Righteous Incivility Revisited
Amy Olberding
Abstract
Amy Olberding
Abstract
Abstract Confucians are almost totally silent about what, if anything, might justify incivility and rudeness. This chapter revisits the issue of righteous incivility, incivility motivated by moral concerns, and considers Confucian resources for addressing when, whether, and how civility norms can be broken. It emphasizes the role of good situational judgment in matters of dissent and advocates for a broader understanding of civility’s possibilities. Civility, as the Confucians practiced it, can be fierce and imaginatively used in dissent. The chapter also considers what a psychology of disagreement rooted in a commitment to civility would look like, articulating an alternative picture to our more commonplace descriptions of righteous incivility.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Confucians are almost totally silent about what, if anything, might justify incivility and rudeness. This chapter revisits the issue of righteous incivility, incivility motivated by moral concerns, and considers Confucian resources for addressing when, whether, and how civility norms can be broken. It emphasizes the role of good situational judgment in matters of dissent and advocates for a broader understanding of civility’s possibilities. Civility, as the Confucians practiced it, can be fierce and imaginatively used in dissent. The chapter also considers what a psychology of disagreement rooted in a commitment to civility would look like, articulating an alternative picture to our more commonplace descriptions of righteous incivility.
Key concepts: Incivility, Psychology, Sociology, Political science, Social psychology