Early Versus Late Surgical Decompression for Acute Spinal Cord Injury: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of 1548 Patients
Jetan H. Badhiwala, Christopher D. Witiw, Jefferson R. Wilson, Michael George Fehlings
Abstract
Jetan H. Badhiwala, Christopher D. Witiw, Jefferson R. Wilson, Michael George Fehlings
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We sought to leverage the statistical power derived from pooling 4 high-quality prospective datasets to compare sensorimotor recovery with early (< 24 hr) vs late (≥ 24 hr) surgical decompression for acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Patients with acute SCI who underwent surgical decompression were identified from 4 prospective, multi-center SCI datasets (NACTN, STASCIS, Sygen, and NASCIS III). Patients were dichotomized into early (< 24 hr) and late (≥ 24 hr) surgery groups. The primary end point was change in ASIA motor score (AMS) at 1-yr. Secondary outcomes included AIS grade and change in ASIA light touch and pin prick scores at 1-yr. One-stage meta-analyses for each outcome were performed by hierarchical mixed-effects regression using a stratified intercept to account for clustering of patients within studies. Fixed-effect covariates were specified for baseline score, age, injury mechanism, AIS grade, neurological level, and steroids. The treatment (early vs late surgery) was specified as a random-effect. RESULTS: A total of 1548 patients were eligible. The early surgery group experienced greater improvement than the late surgery group at 1-yr for AMS (MD 4.0, 95% CI 1.7-6.2, P = .001), light touch score (MD 4.6, 95% CI 1.9-7.2, P = .001), and pin prick score (MD 4.2, 95% CI 1.5-6.9, P = .003). Further, on ‘shift analysis', the early surgery group achieved a more favorable distribution of AIS grades at 1-yr compared to the late surgery group (cOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.87, P = .003). The effect of early surgery was strongest for cervical SCI (P = .003); however, we observed a trend toward improved recovery with early versus late surgery for thoracic SCI as well (MD 5.2, 95% CI -0.8-11.2, P = .088). CONCLUSION: In an individual patient data meta-analysis adjusting for potential confounders, we found early surgery, within 24 hr of injury, to be associated with superior sensorimotor recovery at 1-yr following acute SCI, as compared to late surgery.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
INTRODUCTION: We sought to leverage the statistical power derived from pooling 4 high-quality prospective datasets to compare sensorimotor recovery with early (< 24 hr) vs late (≥ 24 hr) surgical decompression for acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Patients with acute SCI who underwent surgical decompression were identified from 4 prospective, multi-center SCI datasets (NACTN, STASCIS, Sygen, and NASCIS III). Patients were dichotomized into early (< 24 hr) and late (≥ 24 hr) surgery groups. The primary end point was change in ASIA motor score (AMS) at 1-yr. Secondary outcomes included AIS grade and change in ASIA light touch and pin prick scores at 1-yr. One-stage meta-analyses for each outcome were performed by hierarchical mixed-effects regression using a stratified intercept to account for clustering of patients within studies. Fixed-effect covariates were specified for baseline score, age, injury mechanism, AIS grade, neurological level, and steroids. The treatment (early vs late surgery) was specified as a random-effect. RESULTS: A total of 1548 patients were eligible. The early surgery group experienced greater improvement than the late surgery group at 1-yr for AMS (MD 4.0, 95% CI 1.7-6.2, P = .001), light touch score (MD 4.6, 95% CI 1.9-7.2, P = .001), and pin prick score (MD 4.2, 95% CI 1.5-6.9, P = .003). Further, on ‘shift analysis', the early surgery group achieved a more favorable distribution of AIS grades at 1-yr compared to the late surgery group (cOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.87, P = .003). The effect of early surgery was strongest for cervical SCI (P = .003); however, we observed a trend toward improved recovery with early versus late surgery for thoracic SCI as well (MD 5.2, 95% CI -0.8-11.2, P = .088). CONCLUSION: In an individual patient data meta-analysis adjusting for potential confounders, we found early surgery, within 24 hr of injury, to be associated with superior sensorimotor recovery at 1-yr following acute SCI, as compared to late surgery.
Key concepts: Medicine, Decompression, Prospective cohort study, Surgery, Spinal cord injury, Anesthesia, Spinal cord, Psychiatry