2019•Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Further discussions and criticisms of Keynes’s General Theory

Bruna Ingrao, Claudio Sardoni

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The chapter deals with further criticisms of Keynes’s General Theory, notably the critical comments on the liquidity preference theory of the interest rate and the debate on the wealth (or Pigou) effect. These topics were discussed within an analytical framework in which the interrelations among all the relevant variables and markets are taken into account. Such a framework may be depicted as a general-equilibrium context, though not in a proper Walrasian sense. The chapter concentrates on Hicks’s contribution to the theory of interest rates and on Kaldor’s criticisms of Keynes’s liquidity preference. The chapter closes by explaining how the debate on Walras Law and the parallel debate on the Pigou effect ended by erasing the inside financial structure of the economy as irrelevant for the basic Keynesian model. A section is devoted to the evolution of the view of banks and the formalization of the money multiplier.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The chapter deals with further criticisms of Keynes’s General Theory, notably the critical comments on the liquidity preference theory of the interest rate and the debate on the wealth (or Pigou) effect. These topics were discussed within an analytical framework in which the interrelations among all the relevant variables and markets are taken into account. Such a framework may be depicted as a general-equilibrium context, though not in a proper Walrasian sense. The chapter concentrates on Hicks’s contribution to the theory of interest rates and on Kaldor’s criticisms of Keynes’s liquidity preference. The chapter closes by explaining how the debate on Walras Law and the parallel debate on the Pigou effect ended by erasing the inside financial structure of the economy as irrelevant for the basic Keynesian model. A section is devoted to the evolution of the view of banks and the formalization of the money multiplier.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The chapter deals with further criticisms of Keynes’s General Theory, notably the critical comments on the liquidity preference theory of the interest rate and the debate on the wealth (or Pigou) effect. These topics were discussed within an analytical framework in which the interrelations among all the relevant variables and markets are taken into account. Such a framework may be depicted as a general-equilibrium context, though not in a proper Walrasian sense. The chapter concentrates on Hicks’s contribution to the theory of interest rates and on Kaldor’s criticisms of Keynes’s liquidity preference. The chapter closes by explaining how the debate on Walras Law and the parallel debate on the Pigou effect ended by erasing the inside financial structure of the economy as irrelevant for the basic Keynesian model. A section is devoted to the evolution of the view of banks and the formalization of the money multiplier.

Key concepts: Liquidity preference, Pigou effect, Economics, Keynesian economics, General theory, General equilibrium theory, Context (archaeology), Multiplier (economics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Further discussions and criticisms of Keynes’s General Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens