Perceiving That We See and Hear in Aristotle’s De Anima III 2
Roberto Grasso
Abstract
Open-access reader
Roberto Grasso
Abstract
Open-access reader
This article tackles Aristotle's discussion of the activity of 'perceiving that we are seeing and hearing' in De Anima III 2 425b12-25.Its central claim is that the passage postulates a particular type of perception, where a certain content F is perceived in the absence of causal interactions between sense organs and actually perceptible F-objects.In Aristotle's view, the 'underlying' colors being seen must be included in the perception of one's own seeing, but such colors are merely phenomenal and thus deprived of the causal powers by which perceptible objects physically interact with sense organs.The paper also contends that it makes no difference to the aim of the passage whether αἴσθησις and ὄψις describe perceptual activities or capacities, and that Aristotle's much-discussed 'regress argument' can be explained without taking the expression 'perceiving that we see (or hear, etc.)' as an awkward description of the intrinsic 'phenomenal awareness' belonging to first-order perceiving.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article tackles Aristotle's discussion of the activity of 'perceiving that we are seeing and hearing' in De Anima III 2 425b12-25.Its central claim is that the passage postulates a particular type of perception, where a certain content F is perceived in the absence of causal interactions between sense organs and actually perceptible F-objects.In Aristotle's view, the 'underlying' colors being seen must be included in the perception of one's own seeing, but such colors are merely phenomenal and thus deprived of the causal powers by which perceptible objects physically interact with sense organs.The paper also contends that it makes no difference to the aim of the passage whether αἴσθησις and ὄψις describe perceptual activities or capacities, and that Aristotle's much-discussed 'regress argument' can be explained without taking the expression 'perceiving that we see (or hear, etc.)' as an awkward description of the intrinsic 'phenomenal awareness' belonging to first-order perceiving.
Key concepts: Perception, Argument (complex analysis), Philosophy, Epistemology, Order (exchange), Content (measure theory), Expression (computer science), Psychology