2019The Astrophysical JournalOpen access

Constraining the Formation of the Four Terrestrial Planets in the Solar System

Patryk Sofia Lykawka, Takashi Itô

Open full text 29 citations

Abstract

Abstract To reproduce the orbits and masses of the terrestrial planets (analogs) of the solar system, most studies scrutinize simulations for success as a batch. However, there is insufficient discussion in the literature on the likelihood of forming planet analogs simultaneously in the same system (analog system). To address this issue, we performed 540 N-body simulations of protoplanetary disks representative of typical models in the literature. We identified a total of 194 analog systems containing at least three analogs, but only 17 systems simultaneously contained analogs of the four terrestrial planets. From an analysis of our analog systems, we found that, compared to the real planets, truncated disks based on typical outcomes of the Grand Tack model produced analogs of Mercury and Mars that were too dynamically cold and located too close to the Venus and Earth analogs. Additionally, all the Mercury analogs were too massive, while most of the Mars analogs were more massive than Mars. Furthermore, the timing of the Moon-forming impact was too early in these systems, and the amount of additional mass accreted after the event was too great. Therefore, such truncated disks cannot explain the formation of the terrestrial planets. Our results suggest that forming the four terrestrial planets requires disks with the following properties: (1) mass concentrated in narrow core regions between ∼0.7–0.9 au and ∼1.0–1.2 au, (2) an inner region component starting at ∼0.3–0.4 au, (3) a less massive component beginning at ∼1.0–1.2 au, (4) embryos rather than planetesimals carrying most of the disk mass, and (5) Jupiter and Saturn placed on eccentric orbits.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract To reproduce the orbits and masses of the terrestrial planets (analogs) of the solar system, most studies scrutinize simulations for success as a batch. However, there is insufficient discussion in the literature on the likelihood of forming planet analogs simultaneously in the same system (analog system). To address this issue, we performed 540 N-body simulations of protoplanetary disks representative of typical models in the literature. We identified a total of 194 analog systems containing at least three analogs, but only 17 systems simultaneously contained analogs of the four terrestrial planets. From an analysis of our analog systems, we found that, compared to the real planets, truncated disks based on typical outcomes of the Grand Tack model produced analogs of Mercury and Mars that were too dynamically cold and located too close to the Venus and Earth analogs. Additionally, all the Mercury analogs were too massive, while most of the Mars analogs were more massive than Mars. Furthermore, the timing of the Moon-forming impact was too early in these systems, and the amount of additional mass accreted after the event was too great. Therefore, such truncated disks cannot explain the formation of the terrestrial planets. Our results suggest that forming the four terrestrial planets requires disks with the following properties: (1) mass concentrated in narrow core regions between ∼0.7–0.9 au and ∼1.0–1.2 au, (2) an inner region component starting at ∼0.3–0.4 au, (3) a less massive component beginning at ∼1.0–1.2 au, (4) embryos rather than planetesimals carrying most of the disk mass, and (5) Jupiter and Saturn placed on eccentric orbits.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract To reproduce the orbits and masses of the terrestrial planets (analogs) of the solar system, most studies scrutinize simulations for success as a batch. However, there is insufficient discussion in the literature on the likelihood of forming planet analogs simultaneously in the same system (analog system). To address this issue, we performed 540 N-body simulations of protoplanetary disks representative of typical models in the literature. We identified a total of 194 analog systems containing at least three analogs, but only 17 systems simultaneously contained analogs of the four terrestrial planets. From an analysis of our analog systems, we found that, compared to the real planets, truncated disks based on typical outcomes of the Grand Tack model produced analogs of Mercury and Mars that were too dynamically cold and located too close to the Venus and Earth analogs. Additionally, all the Mercury analogs were too massive, while most of the Mars analogs were more massive than Mars. Furthermore, the timing of the Moon-forming impact was too early in these systems, and the amount of additional mass accreted after the event was too great. Therefore, such truncated disks cannot explain the formation of the terrestrial planets. Our results suggest that forming the four terrestrial planets requires disks with the following properties: (1) mass concentrated in narrow core regions between ∼0.7–0.9 au and ∼1.0–1.2 au, (2) an inner region component starting at ∼0.3–0.4 au, (3) a less massive component beginning at ∼1.0–1.2 au, (4) embryos rather than planetesimals carrying most of the disk mass, and (5) Jupiter and Saturn placed on eccentric orbits.

Key concepts: Terrestrial planet, Planet, Astrobiology, Solar System, Mars Exploration Program, Venus, Physics, Planetary mass

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Constraining the Formation of the Four Terrestrial Planets in the Solar System — Research Paper | ScholarLens