2014PubMedOpen access

Predicting scores correlations in patients with septic shock - a cohort study.

Anca-Meda Georgescu, János Szederjesi, Sanda‐Maria Copotoiu, Leonard Azamfirei

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ICU prognostic scores were developed to measure the severity of the disease and the patients' prognosis. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scores in patients with septic shock. METHODS: The APACHE II, SOFA and SAPS II scores were determined prospectively, in the first 24 hours after admission, for all 56 patients with septic shock who were included in this study. Data were statistically evaluated; the discriminating power regarding survivors vs deceased patients was calculated based on the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). RESULTS: The overall mortality of the 56 patients with septic shock was 60.71% (34 deaths). The average APACHE II score was 25.36 ± 7.477. The average SOFA score was 7.679 ± 3.197. The average SAPS II score was 44.45 ± 16.97. For the APACHE II and SOFA scores the differences when deceased and survivors were compared were not statistically significant (APACHE II: 26.76 ± 6.742 vs 23.18 ± 8.175 respectively for SOFA: 8.029 ± 3.099 vs 7.136 ± 3.342). For the SAPS II score the values are: 49.12 ± 16.61 in deceased vs 37.23 ± 15.20 in survivors, the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.0092). The areas under ROC for the three scores are 0.622 for APACHE II, 0.575 for SAPS II and 0.705 for SOFA. CONCLUSIONS: In our study the SAPS II score was superior to the other scores for predicting survival in patients with septic shock.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: ICU prognostic scores were developed to measure the severity of the disease and the patients' prognosis. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scores in patients with septic shock. METHODS: The APACHE II, SOFA and SAPS II scores were determined prospectively, in the first 24 hours after admission, for all 56 patients with septic shock who were included in this study. Data were statistically evaluated; the discriminating power regarding survivors vs deceased patients was calculated based on the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). RESULTS: The overall mortality of the 56 patients with septic shock was 60.71% (34 deaths). The average APACHE II score was 25.36 ± 7.477. The average SOFA score was 7.679 ± 3.197. The average SAPS II score was 44.45 ± 16.97. For the APACHE II and SOFA scores the differences when deceased and survivors were compared were not statistically significant (APACHE II: 26.76 ± 6.742 vs 23.18 ± 8.175 respectively for SOFA: 8.029 ± 3.099 vs 7.136 ± 3.342). For the SAPS II score the values are: 49.12 ± 16.61 in deceased vs 37.23 ± 15.20 in survivors, the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.0092). The areas under ROC for the three scores are 0.622 for APACHE II, 0.575 for SAPS II and 0.705 for SOFA. CONCLUSIONS: In our study the SAPS II score was superior to the other scores for predicting survival in patients with septic shock.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: ICU prognostic scores were developed to measure the severity of the disease and the patients' prognosis. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scores in patients with septic shock. METHODS: The APACHE II, SOFA and SAPS II scores were determined prospectively, in the first 24 hours after admission, for all 56 patients with septic shock who were included in this study. Data were statistically evaluated; the discriminating power regarding survivors vs deceased patients was calculated based on the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). RESULTS: The overall mortality of the 56 patients with septic shock was 60.71% (34 deaths). The average APACHE II score was 25.36 ± 7.477. The average SOFA score was 7.679 ± 3.197. The average SAPS II score was 44.45 ± 16.97. For the APACHE II and SOFA scores the differences when deceased and survivors were compared were not statistically significant (APACHE II: 26.76 ± 6.742 vs 23.18 ± 8.175 respectively for SOFA: 8.029 ± 3.099 vs 7.136 ± 3.342). For the SAPS II score the values are: 49.12 ± 16.61 in deceased vs 37.23 ± 15.20 in survivors, the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.0092). The areas under ROC for the three scores are 0.622 for APACHE II, 0.575 for SAPS II and 0.705 for SOFA. CONCLUSIONS: In our study the SAPS II score was superior to the other scores for predicting survival in patients with septic shock.

Key concepts: SOFA score, APACHE II, Septic shock, Medicine, SAPS II, Receiver operating characteristic, Internal medicine, Sepsis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Predicting scores correlations in patients with septic shock - a cohort study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens