2017PubMedRequires access

Progress in diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hemolytic disorders.

Toyomi Kamesaki

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Discovery of the Coombs' test was an epoch-making event in the history of managing autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). The Coombs' test allows immune-related hemolytic anemia to be distinguished from nonimmune acquired hemolytic anemia, but also creates a complicated category; Coombs-negative AIHA. To resolve this problem, several trials have been conducted to detect immunoglobulin (Ig) G molecules on erythrocytes (RBC-IgG) that the Coombs' test cannot detect. In Japan, RBC-IgG can be quantitated using a radioimmunoassay, but this procedure is time-consuming and expensive. Convenient quantitative analysis of RBC-IgG has recently been reported using flow cytometry, a semi-quantitative method. In the treatment of warm AIHA, corticosteroids represent the first-line therapy. For refractory and relapsed cases, the choice may be between splenectomy and rituximab, which is becoming the preferred second-line treatment. Progress in the treatment of warm AIHA is also reviewed in this article.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Discovery of the Coombs' test was an epoch-making event in the history of managing autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). The Coombs' test allows immune-related hemolytic anemia to be distinguished from nonimmune acquired hemolytic anemia, but also creates a complicated category; Coombs-negative AIHA. To resolve this problem, several trials have been conducted to detect immunoglobulin (Ig) G molecules on erythrocytes (RBC-IgG) that the Coombs' test cannot detect. In Japan, RBC-IgG can be quantitated using a radioimmunoassay, but this procedure is time-consuming and expensive. Convenient quantitative analysis of RBC-IgG has recently been reported using flow cytometry, a semi-quantitative method. In the treatment of warm AIHA, corticosteroids represent the first-line therapy. For refractory and relapsed cases, the choice may be between splenectomy and rituximab, which is becoming the preferred second-line treatment. Progress in the treatment of warm AIHA is also reviewed in this article.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Discovery of the Coombs' test was an epoch-making event in the history of managing autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). The Coombs' test allows immune-related hemolytic anemia to be distinguished from nonimmune acquired hemolytic anemia, but also creates a complicated category; Coombs-negative AIHA. To resolve this problem, several trials have been conducted to detect immunoglobulin (Ig) G molecules on erythrocytes (RBC-IgG) that the Coombs' test cannot detect. In Japan, RBC-IgG can be quantitated using a radioimmunoassay, but this procedure is time-consuming and expensive. Convenient quantitative analysis of RBC-IgG has recently been reported using flow cytometry, a semi-quantitative method. In the treatment of warm AIHA, corticosteroids represent the first-line therapy. For refractory and relapsed cases, the choice may be between splenectomy and rituximab, which is becoming the preferred second-line treatment. Progress in the treatment of warm AIHA is also reviewed in this article.

Key concepts: Autoimmune hemolytic anemia, Medicine, Coombs test, Rituximab, Splenectomy, Immunology, Hemolytic anemia, Anemia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Progress in diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hemolytic disorders. — Research Paper | ScholarLens