2019•Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

How emotions move us: An integrative framework for emotions and decision making

Maia Goodman Young, Yuxuan Lily Zhu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Much research on emotions and decision making asserts that experiencing an emotion can affect subsequent decisions through the emotion’s associated cognitive appraisals. Focusing on the appraisals associated with emotions represents but one view on emotional experiences–one that emphasizes the interpretations of the environment that accompany emotions. A related but distinct component of emotions is action tendency, which represents the drive to execute an action to achieve a particular goal (Frijda, 1986). The current paper introduces an Integrative Framework for Emotions and Decision Making (IFED) which asserts that emotions can affect decisions by two distinct pathways–cognitive appraisals and action tendencies (Proposition 1). The IFED proposes that inherent qualities of each emotion may moderate whether the appraisal or action tendency is more likely to affect subsequent decisions (Propositions 2a and 2b) and presents contextual moderators for whether an emotion’s appraisals or action tendencies carry over (Propositions 3a, 3b, 4, and 5). Finally, we outline implications for future research, such as selecting study materials, emotion comparison conditions, and study measures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Much research on emotions and decision making asserts that experiencing an emotion can affect subsequent decisions through the emotion’s associated cognitive appraisals. Focusing on the appraisals associated with emotions represents but one view on emotional experiences–one that emphasizes the interpretations of the environment that accompany emotions. A related but distinct component of emotions is action tendency, which represents the drive to execute an action to achieve a particular goal (Frijda, 1986). The current paper introduces an Integrative Framework for Emotions and Decision Making (IFED) which asserts that emotions can affect decisions by two distinct pathways–cognitive appraisals and action tendencies (Proposition 1). The IFED proposes that inherent qualities of each emotion may moderate whether the appraisal or action tendency is more likely to affect subsequent decisions (Propositions 2a and 2b) and presents contextual moderators for whether an emotion’s appraisals or action tendencies carry over (Propositions 3a, 3b, 4, and 5). Finally, we outline implications for future research, such as selecting study materials, emotion comparison conditions, and study measures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Much research on emotions and decision making asserts that experiencing an emotion can affect subsequent decisions through the emotion’s associated cognitive appraisals. Focusing on the appraisals associated with emotions represents but one view on emotional experiences–one that emphasizes the interpretations of the environment that accompany emotions. A related but distinct component of emotions is action tendency, which represents the drive to execute an action to achieve a particular goal (Frijda, 1986). The current paper introduces an Integrative Framework for Emotions and Decision Making (IFED) which asserts that emotions can affect decisions by two distinct pathways–cognitive appraisals and action tendencies (Proposition 1). The IFED proposes that inherent qualities of each emotion may moderate whether the appraisal or action tendency is more likely to affect subsequent decisions (Propositions 2a and 2b) and presents contextual moderators for whether an emotion’s appraisals or action tendencies carry over (Propositions 3a, 3b, 4, and 5). Finally, we outline implications for future research, such as selecting study materials, emotion comparison conditions, and study measures.

Key concepts: Affect (linguistics), Action (physics), Psychology, Cognitive appraisal, Proposition, Cognition, Cognitive psychology, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How emotions move us: An integrative framework for emotions and decision making — Research Paper | ScholarLens