2019Canadian Geotechnical JournalRequires access

Analysis of sand – woven geotextile interface shear behavior using discrete element method (DEM)

Shi‐Jin Feng, Jie-Ni Chen, Hongxin Chen, Xin Liu, Tao Zhao, Annan Zhou

Open publisher page 72 citations

Abstract

The interaction between soil and geotextile is essential for the performance of reinforced soil. This study reveals the microscopic mechanism of interface shear between sand and geotextile based on the discrete element method (DEM). The surface characteristics of geotextile are simulated by overlapped particles. The micromechanical parameters of sand, geotextile, and interface are calibrated effectively using laboratory test results. Three types of shear tests on the sand–geotextile interface are simulated; namely, interface direct shear test (IDST), double-sided interface shear test (D_IST), and interface direct shear test with periodic boundary (PBST). For IDST, the results show that the thickness of shear band is 2.4∼3.0 times the average particle diameter (D 50 ); the contact force, percentage of sliding contact, and contact normal anisotropy inside the shear band are larger than those outside the shear band, whereas the coordination number is smaller inside the shear band. The mechanical response of D_IST is similar to that of IDST. However, D_IST has a shear band thickness of 3.0D 50 , and greater coordination number, percentage of sliding contact, and contact normal anisotropy. The results of PBST indicate that the peak stress and the shear band no longer appear without boundary constraint and the contact distribution is uniform.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The interaction between soil and geotextile is essential for the performance of reinforced soil. This study reveals the microscopic mechanism of interface shear between sand and geotextile based on the discrete element method (DEM). The surface characteristics of geotextile are simulated by overlapped particles. The micromechanical parameters of sand, geotextile, and interface are calibrated effectively using laboratory test results. Three types of shear tests on the sand–geotextile interface are simulated; namely, interface direct shear test (IDST), double-sided interface shear test (D_IST), and interface direct shear test with periodic boundary (PBST). For IDST, the results show that the thickness of shear band is 2.4∼3.0 times the average particle diameter (D 50 ); the contact force, percentage of sliding contact, and contact normal anisotropy inside the shear band are larger than those outside the shear band, whereas the coordination number is smaller inside the shear band. The mechanical response of D_IST is similar to that of IDST. However, D_IST has a shear band thickness of 3.0D 50 , and greater coordination number, percentage of sliding contact, and contact normal anisotropy. The results of PBST indicate that the peak stress and the shear band no longer appear without boundary constraint and the contact distribution is uniform.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 72 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The interaction between soil and geotextile is essential for the performance of reinforced soil. This study reveals the microscopic mechanism of interface shear between sand and geotextile based on the discrete element method (DEM). The surface characteristics of geotextile are simulated by overlapped particles. The micromechanical parameters of sand, geotextile, and interface are calibrated effectively using laboratory test results. Three types of shear tests on the sand–geotextile interface are simulated; namely, interface direct shear test (IDST), double-sided interface shear test (D_IST), and interface direct shear test with periodic boundary (PBST). For IDST, the results show that the thickness of shear band is 2.4∼3.0 times the average particle diameter (D 50 ); the contact force, percentage of sliding contact, and contact normal anisotropy inside the shear band are larger than those outside the shear band, whereas the coordination number is smaller inside the shear band. The mechanical response of D_IST is similar to that of IDST. However, D_IST has a shear band thickness of 3.0D 50 , and greater coordination number, percentage of sliding contact, and contact normal anisotropy. The results of PBST indicate that the peak stress and the shear band no longer appear without boundary constraint and the contact distribution is uniform.

Key concepts: Direct shear test, Geotextile, Discrete element method, Geotechnical engineering, Shear (geology), Materials science, Triaxial shear test, Shear stress

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of sand – woven geotextile interface shear behavior using discrete element method (DEM) — Research Paper | ScholarLens