2018•Healthy, Intelligent and Resilient Buildings and Urban EnvironmentsOpen access

Analysis of thermal bridges in insulated masonry walls: a comparison between vacuum insulated panels and expanded polystyrene

Adrian Bucur, Ligia Mihaela Moga

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The paper presents a comparative study between the thermal performances of a couple of masonry walls with no insulation and then insulated with vacuum insulation panels and expanded polystyrene. The research purpose is to demonstrate the superior thermal performance of the vacuum insulation panels compared to common thermal insulation, in initial state and even after 25 years in service. It also provides the steps to determine the effective thermal resistance of the buildings elements insulated with vacuum insulation panels, considering both local and geometric thermal bridges. Results emphasize that even after 25 years in use, the walls insulated with vacuum insulation panels with reduced thickness possess a greater thermal performance than that of the walls insulated with expanded polystyrene with common thickness. This is one of the reasons for which this material should be improved and developed further for the future buildings envelopes.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper presents a comparative study between the thermal performances of a couple of masonry walls with no insulation and then insulated with vacuum insulation panels and expanded polystyrene. The research purpose is to demonstrate the superior thermal performance of the vacuum insulation panels compared to common thermal insulation, in initial state and even after 25 years in service. It also provides the steps to determine the effective thermal resistance of the buildings elements insulated with vacuum insulation panels, considering both local and geometric thermal bridges. Results emphasize that even after 25 years in use, the walls insulated with vacuum insulation panels with reduced thickness possess a greater thermal performance than that of the walls insulated with expanded polystyrene with common thickness. This is one of the reasons for which this material should be improved and developed further for the future buildings envelopes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper presents a comparative study between the thermal performances of a couple of masonry walls with no insulation and then insulated with vacuum insulation panels and expanded polystyrene. The research purpose is to demonstrate the superior thermal performance of the vacuum insulation panels compared to common thermal insulation, in initial state and even after 25 years in service. It also provides the steps to determine the effective thermal resistance of the buildings elements insulated with vacuum insulation panels, considering both local and geometric thermal bridges. Results emphasize that even after 25 years in use, the walls insulated with vacuum insulation panels with reduced thickness possess a greater thermal performance than that of the walls insulated with expanded polystyrene with common thickness. This is one of the reasons for which this material should be improved and developed further for the future buildings envelopes.

Key concepts: Vacuum insulated panel, Expanded polystyrene, Thermal insulation, Materials science, Masonry, Composite material, Polystyrene, Thermal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of thermal bridges in insulated masonry walls: a comparison between vacuum insulated panels and expanded polystyrene — Research Paper | ScholarLens