1978•Southern Journal of Applied ForestryRequires access

Spacing Eucalyptus grandis in Southern Florida—A Question of Merchantable versus Total Volume

George Meskimen, E. C. Franklin

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Abstract The volume in merchantable trees (4 inches d.b.h. and larger) was about the same at spacings of 4 x 8, 8 x 8, 12 x 8, and 16 x 8 feet for Eucalyptus grandis trees at plantation age 7.4 years in Glades County, Florida. Total volume in all stems, however, was 1.7 times greater at the closest spacing than at the two widest spacings. Thus, in a conventional pulpwood system, merchantable yields equal to those from closer spacings could be obtained from the wider spacings at lower cost for establishment and harvest. However, if merchantability limits could be circumvented by field chipping small trees, volume yields 16 to 68 percent greater could be achieved by planting at close spacings. Neither wood quality nor tree height was appreciably affected by stand density over the range of spacings tested. If the harvesting system is unknown at planting time, a spacing of about 6 x 12 feet is probably best.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The volume in merchantable trees (4 inches d.b.h. and larger) was about the same at spacings of 4 x 8, 8 x 8, 12 x 8, and 16 x 8 feet for Eucalyptus grandis trees at plantation age 7.4 years in Glades County, Florida. Total volume in all stems, however, was 1.7 times greater at the closest spacing than at the two widest spacings. Thus, in a conventional pulpwood system, merchantable yields equal to those from closer spacings could be obtained from the wider spacings at lower cost for establishment and harvest. However, if merchantability limits could be circumvented by field chipping small trees, volume yields 16 to 68 percent greater could be achieved by planting at close spacings. Neither wood quality nor tree height was appreciably affected by stand density over the range of spacings tested. If the harvesting system is unknown at planting time, a spacing of about 6 x 12 feet is probably best.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The volume in merchantable trees (4 inches d.b.h. and larger) was about the same at spacings of 4 x 8, 8 x 8, 12 x 8, and 16 x 8 feet for Eucalyptus grandis trees at plantation age 7.4 years in Glades County, Florida. Total volume in all stems, however, was 1.7 times greater at the closest spacing than at the two widest spacings. Thus, in a conventional pulpwood system, merchantable yields equal to those from closer spacings could be obtained from the wider spacings at lower cost for establishment and harvest. However, if merchantability limits could be circumvented by field chipping small trees, volume yields 16 to 68 percent greater could be achieved by planting at close spacings. Neither wood quality nor tree height was appreciably affected by stand density over the range of spacings tested. If the harvesting system is unknown at planting time, a spacing of about 6 x 12 feet is probably best.

Key concepts: Pulpwood, Eucalyptus, Sowing, Volume (thermodynamics), Forestry, Mathematics, Range (aeronautics), Agroforestry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spacing Eucalyptus grandis in Southern Florida—A Question of Merchantable versus Total Volume — Research Paper | ScholarLens