A BILL OF RIGHTS AND FUTURE CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE
Walter S. Tarnopolsky
Abstract
Walter S. Tarnopolsky
Abstract
The author accepts that there is no longer any question of whether there ought to be a Canadian Bill of Rights, but questions what the nature of that document should be. He explores Bill C-60, focusing on the overriding effect of a Bill of Rights, its definition and scope, and enforcement and remedies. He concludes that the Bill of Rights will never be amended except to improve it, and that the current or a strengthened version will become an entrenched constitutional document should the B.N.A. Act be patriated or replaced.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The author accepts that there is no longer any question of whether there ought to be a Canadian Bill of Rights, but questions what the nature of that document should be. He explores Bill C-60, focusing on the overriding effect of a Bill of Rights, its definition and scope, and enforcement and remedies. He concludes that the Bill of Rights will never be amended except to improve it, and that the current or a strengthened version will become an entrenched constitutional document should the B.N.A. Act be patriated or replaced.
Key concepts: Bill of rights, Political science, Scope (computer science), Law, Enforcement, Law and economics, Human rights, Sociology