2019Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

Measuring Attitudes towards Slack Resources: Construct Development and Empirical Validation

Selim Cakir, Gerard P. Hodgkinson, Keith W. Glaister

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The literature is deeply polarized regarding the role played by slack in organizations. Researchers debate whether organizational slack is a sure sign of inefficiency in the workplace or a necessary cost to enhance the competitiveness and adaptive capabilities of firms. While managers hold great importance in the accumulation and the use of slack resources, there is no existing assessment tool in the extant literature in order to examine how their attitudes toward organizational slack inform their conduct (i.e. shape their decisions and actions). In order to address this shortfall, we develop and validate the Attitudes Towards Slack Resources Questionnaire (ATSRQ). Reporting the findings of five empirical studies, we demonstrate that the resulting new instrument displays acceptable reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability), and construct (convergent and discriminant) and criterion-related validity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The literature is deeply polarized regarding the role played by slack in organizations. Researchers debate whether organizational slack is a sure sign of inefficiency in the workplace or a necessary cost to enhance the competitiveness and adaptive capabilities of firms. While managers hold great importance in the accumulation and the use of slack resources, there is no existing assessment tool in the extant literature in order to examine how their attitudes toward organizational slack inform their conduct (i.e. shape their decisions and actions). In order to address this shortfall, we develop and validate the Attitudes Towards Slack Resources Questionnaire (ATSRQ). Reporting the findings of five empirical studies, we demonstrate that the resulting new instrument displays acceptable reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability), and construct (convergent and discriminant) and criterion-related validity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The literature is deeply polarized regarding the role played by slack in organizations. Researchers debate whether organizational slack is a sure sign of inefficiency in the workplace or a necessary cost to enhance the competitiveness and adaptive capabilities of firms. While managers hold great importance in the accumulation and the use of slack resources, there is no existing assessment tool in the extant literature in order to examine how their attitudes toward organizational slack inform their conduct (i.e. shape their decisions and actions). In order to address this shortfall, we develop and validate the Attitudes Towards Slack Resources Questionnaire (ATSRQ). Reporting the findings of five empirical studies, we demonstrate that the resulting new instrument displays acceptable reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability), and construct (convergent and discriminant) and criterion-related validity.

Key concepts: Construct (python library), Inefficiency, Extant taxon, Construct validity, Discriminant validity, Reliability (semiconductor), Empirical research, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measuring Attitudes towards Slack Resources: Construct Development and Empirical Validation — Research Paper | ScholarLens