2019The Egyptian Journal of Hospital MedicineOpen access

A Comparison between Both Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Agents (Eplerenone and Spironolactone) in Prognosis of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)

Mohamed Ayman Saleh, Ramadan Ghaleb Mohammed, Ayman Ibrahim, Mena Mekhail Solhy

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Background: heart is the target organ for Aldosterone, spironolactone and eplerenone (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) inhibits the aldosterone extraction through the heart in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Objective: to evaluate prognostic impact of both MRA (spironolactone and eplerenone) on heart failure and compare between both agents in incidence of side effect (gynecomastia and hyperkalemia). Patients and Methods: the study was conducted from March 2016 to September 2016 at Aswan University hospital. Our study population consisted of 100 adult patients, who were proved to have heart failure symptoms, with reduced ejection fraction heart failure divided in two groups. Group A contains 50 patients on spironolactone in addition to other anti-failure treatments according to ESC guidelines. Group B is 50 patients on eplerenone in addition to other anti-failure treatments according to ESC guidelines. Results: follow up had been done after one month for patient clinical status and serum potassium level and development of gynecomastia. Another Follow up was done after 3 months for BNP level, gynecomastia, NYHA classification and body weight. Conclusion: MRA are important line of treatment in HF patients, eplerenone and spironolactone are both have good result in improving BNP level and improving NYHA classifications and patients weight loss.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: heart is the target organ for Aldosterone, spironolactone and eplerenone (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) inhibits the aldosterone extraction through the heart in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Objective: to evaluate prognostic impact of both MRA (spironolactone and eplerenone) on heart failure and compare between both agents in incidence of side effect (gynecomastia and hyperkalemia). Patients and Methods: the study was conducted from March 2016 to September 2016 at Aswan University hospital. Our study population consisted of 100 adult patients, who were proved to have heart failure symptoms, with reduced ejection fraction heart failure divided in two groups. Group A contains 50 patients on spironolactone in addition to other anti-failure treatments according to ESC guidelines. Group B is 50 patients on eplerenone in addition to other anti-failure treatments according to ESC guidelines. Results: follow up had been done after one month for patient clinical status and serum potassium level and development of gynecomastia. Another Follow up was done after 3 months for BNP level, gynecomastia, NYHA classification and body weight. Conclusion: MRA are important line of treatment in HF patients, eplerenone and spironolactone are both have good result in improving BNP level and improving NYHA classifications and patients weight loss.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: heart is the target organ for Aldosterone, spironolactone and eplerenone (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) inhibits the aldosterone extraction through the heart in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Objective: to evaluate prognostic impact of both MRA (spironolactone and eplerenone) on heart failure and compare between both agents in incidence of side effect (gynecomastia and hyperkalemia). Patients and Methods: the study was conducted from March 2016 to September 2016 at Aswan University hospital. Our study population consisted of 100 adult patients, who were proved to have heart failure symptoms, with reduced ejection fraction heart failure divided in two groups. Group A contains 50 patients on spironolactone in addition to other anti-failure treatments according to ESC guidelines. Group B is 50 patients on eplerenone in addition to other anti-failure treatments according to ESC guidelines. Results: follow up had been done after one month for patient clinical status and serum potassium level and development of gynecomastia. Another Follow up was done after 3 months for BNP level, gynecomastia, NYHA classification and body weight. Conclusion: MRA are important line of treatment in HF patients, eplerenone and spironolactone are both have good result in improving BNP level and improving NYHA classifications and patients weight loss.

Key concepts: Eplerenone, Spironolactone, Medicine, Heart failure, Ejection fraction, Internal medicine, Mineralocorticoid receptor, Aldosterone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison between Both Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Agents (Eplerenone and Spironolactone) in Prognosis of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) — Research Paper | ScholarLens