2019Unpublished venueRequires access

On the Background of Social Epistemology

David Henderson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This introduction presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book. The book discusses the work of Thomas Kuhn and the related historical study of science—and he traces some of the associated work in the philosophy of science that responded to the history of science. It explores the recognizable various antecedents of concerns that are both sociological and philosophical. The book traces the way in which contemporary analytic epistemology came to be concerned with the social production and the social distribution of knowledge. Science as a social phenomenon will inherit various biases and limits from the social groups in which it is practiced. Externalist epistemology afforded the opening for social epistemology. Epistemology had to do with the class of processes by which folk ought to form and maintain their beliefs or understandings, and these were taken to be those with some fitting balance of reliability and power or fecundity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This introduction presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book. The book discusses the work of Thomas Kuhn and the related historical study of science—and he traces some of the associated work in the philosophy of science that responded to the history of science. It explores the recognizable various antecedents of concerns that are both sociological and philosophical. The book traces the way in which contemporary analytic epistemology came to be concerned with the social production and the social distribution of knowledge. Science as a social phenomenon will inherit various biases and limits from the social groups in which it is practiced. Externalist epistemology afforded the opening for social epistemology. Epistemology had to do with the class of processes by which folk ought to form and maintain their beliefs or understandings, and these were taken to be those with some fitting balance of reliability and power or fecundity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This introduction presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book. The book discusses the work of Thomas Kuhn and the related historical study of science—and he traces some of the associated work in the philosophy of science that responded to the history of science. It explores the recognizable various antecedents of concerns that are both sociological and philosophical. The book traces the way in which contemporary analytic epistemology came to be concerned with the social production and the social distribution of knowledge. Science as a social phenomenon will inherit various biases and limits from the social groups in which it is practiced. Externalist epistemology afforded the opening for social epistemology. Epistemology had to do with the class of processes by which folk ought to form and maintain their beliefs or understandings, and these were taken to be those with some fitting balance of reliability and power or fecundity.

Key concepts: Social epistemology, Epistemology, Sociology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Background of Social Epistemology — Research Paper | ScholarLens