2013•Chinese Physics CRequires access

Measurement and analysis of fission rates in a spherical mockup of uranium and polyethylene

Tong-Hua Zhu, Chaowen Yang, Xinxin Lu, Rong Liu, Zijie Han, Li Jiang, Mei Wang

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Measurements of the reaction rate distribution were carried out using two kinds of Plate Micro Fission Chamber(PMFC).The first is a depleted uranium chamber and the second an enriched uranium chamber.The material in the depleted uranium chamber is strictly the same as the material in the uranium assembly.With the equation solution to conduct the isotope contribution correction, the fission rate of 238 U and 235 U were obtained from the fission rate of depleted uranium and enriched uranium.And then, the fission count of 238 U and 235 U in an individual uranium shell was obtained.In this work, MCNP5 and continuous energy cross sections ENDF/BV.0 were used for the analysis of fission rate distribution and fission count.The calculated results were compared with the experimental ones.The calculation of fission rate of DU and EU were found to agree with the measured ones within 10% except at the positions in polyethylene region and the two positions near the outer surface.Beacause the fission chamber was not considered in the calculation of the fission counts of 238 U and 235 U, the calculated results did not agree well with the experimental ones.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Measurements of the reaction rate distribution were carried out using two kinds of Plate Micro Fission Chamber(PMFC).The first is a depleted uranium chamber and the second an enriched uranium chamber.The material in the depleted uranium chamber is strictly the same as the material in the uranium assembly.With the equation solution to conduct the isotope contribution correction, the fission rate of 238 U and 235 U were obtained from the fission rate of depleted uranium and enriched uranium.And then, the fission count of 238 U and 235 U in an individual uranium shell was obtained.In this work, MCNP5 and continuous energy cross sections ENDF/BV.0 were used for the analysis of fission rate distribution and fission count.The calculated results were compared with the experimental ones.The calculation of fission rate of DU and EU were found to agree with the measured ones within 10% except at the positions in polyethylene region and the two positions near the outer surface.Beacause the fission chamber was not considered in the calculation of the fission counts of 238 U and 235 U, the calculated results did not agree well with the experimental ones.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Measurements of the reaction rate distribution were carried out using two kinds of Plate Micro Fission Chamber(PMFC).The first is a depleted uranium chamber and the second an enriched uranium chamber.The material in the depleted uranium chamber is strictly the same as the material in the uranium assembly.With the equation solution to conduct the isotope contribution correction, the fission rate of 238 U and 235 U were obtained from the fission rate of depleted uranium and enriched uranium.And then, the fission count of 238 U and 235 U in an individual uranium shell was obtained.In this work, MCNP5 and continuous energy cross sections ENDF/BV.0 were used for the analysis of fission rate distribution and fission count.The calculated results were compared with the experimental ones.The calculation of fission rate of DU and EU were found to agree with the measured ones within 10% except at the positions in polyethylene region and the two positions near the outer surface.Beacause the fission chamber was not considered in the calculation of the fission counts of 238 U and 235 U, the calculated results did not agree well with the experimental ones.

Key concepts: Mockup, Physics, Uranium, Nuclear engineering, Fission, Nuclear physics, Fission products, Radiochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measurement and analysis of fission rates in a spherical mockup of uranium and polyethylene — Research Paper | ScholarLens