2019Japanese Journal of Radiological TechnologyOpen access

Multicenter Survey of the Display Air Kerma and Actual Measured Values in IVR X-ray Apparatus

Nobuaki Tanabe, Hiroyuki Sekiguchi, Atsuko Tsukamoto, Hiroyuki Ishida, Ueno Hiroki, Daisuke Kittaka, Hiroe Takura, Kohei Fujimura, O. Tajima, Hisaya Sato, Takamichi Tajima, Hiroshi Hiroshima

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a multicenter study to investigate the current status of difference between the actual values at the patient entrance reference point (PERP) and display air kerma. METHODS: We exposure dose and fluoroscopy dose were measured by 32 apparatuses at 32 member institutions of the Japanese Society of Circulation Imaging Technology (CITEC) under unified conditions, and the actual measured values and display air kerma were compared. We entrance doses during fluoroscopy and imaging were measured at the PERP, with focus detector distance (FDD) 110 cm, a copper plate of 3.5 mm in thickness adhered to the front face of flat panel detector (FPD) as absorber, field-of-view (FOV) 18 cm, and the frame rate of 15 f/s, excluding the bed. Display air kerma were recorded at the same time. JIS (Z 4751-2-43: 2012) specify "The reference air kerma rate and the cumulative reference air kerma shall not deviate from their respective display air kerma by more than ±35% over the range of 6 mGy/min and 100 mGy to the maximum value." The number of apparatuses display air kerma deviated from this condition and its percentage were obtained. RESULTS: The mean difference percentage between actual measured values and display air kerma in 32 apparatuses was approximately 15.6%, with some apparatuses showing substantially different display air kerma. CONCLUSION: In order to estimate patients' skin exposure dose from display air kerma more accurately, it is necessary to perform calibration of the apparatus by regular dose measurement or convert values.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: We conducted a multicenter study to investigate the current status of difference between the actual values at the patient entrance reference point (PERP) and display air kerma. METHODS: We exposure dose and fluoroscopy dose were measured by 32 apparatuses at 32 member institutions of the Japanese Society of Circulation Imaging Technology (CITEC) under unified conditions, and the actual measured values and display air kerma were compared. We entrance doses during fluoroscopy and imaging were measured at the PERP, with focus detector distance (FDD) 110 cm, a copper plate of 3.5 mm in thickness adhered to the front face of flat panel detector (FPD) as absorber, field-of-view (FOV) 18 cm, and the frame rate of 15 f/s, excluding the bed. Display air kerma were recorded at the same time. JIS (Z 4751-2-43: 2012) specify "The reference air kerma rate and the cumulative reference air kerma shall not deviate from their respective display air kerma by more than ±35% over the range of 6 mGy/min and 100 mGy to the maximum value." The number of apparatuses display air kerma deviated from this condition and its percentage were obtained. RESULTS: The mean difference percentage between actual measured values and display air kerma in 32 apparatuses was approximately 15.6%, with some apparatuses showing substantially different display air kerma. CONCLUSION: In order to estimate patients' skin exposure dose from display air kerma more accurately, it is necessary to perform calibration of the apparatus by regular dose measurement or convert values.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a multicenter study to investigate the current status of difference between the actual values at the patient entrance reference point (PERP) and display air kerma. METHODS: We exposure dose and fluoroscopy dose were measured by 32 apparatuses at 32 member institutions of the Japanese Society of Circulation Imaging Technology (CITEC) under unified conditions, and the actual measured values and display air kerma were compared. We entrance doses during fluoroscopy and imaging were measured at the PERP, with focus detector distance (FDD) 110 cm, a copper plate of 3.5 mm in thickness adhered to the front face of flat panel detector (FPD) as absorber, field-of-view (FOV) 18 cm, and the frame rate of 15 f/s, excluding the bed. Display air kerma were recorded at the same time. JIS (Z 4751-2-43: 2012) specify "The reference air kerma rate and the cumulative reference air kerma shall not deviate from their respective display air kerma by more than ±35% over the range of 6 mGy/min and 100 mGy to the maximum value." The number of apparatuses display air kerma deviated from this condition and its percentage were obtained. RESULTS: The mean difference percentage between actual measured values and display air kerma in 32 apparatuses was approximately 15.6%, with some apparatuses showing substantially different display air kerma. CONCLUSION: In order to estimate patients' skin exposure dose from display air kerma more accurately, it is necessary to perform calibration of the apparatus by regular dose measurement or convert values.

Key concepts: Kerma, Fluoroscopy, Calibration, Nuclear medicine, Detector, Flat panel detector, Optics, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multicenter Survey of the Display Air Kerma and Actual Measured Values in IVR X-ray Apparatus — Research Paper | ScholarLens