2018•Journal of Graph TheoryRequires access

Antimagic orientations of even regular graphs

Tong Li, Zi‐Xia Song, Guanghui Wang, Donglei Yang, Cun‐Quan Zhang

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

Abstract A labeling of a digraph D with m arcs is a bijection from the set of arcs of D to . A labeling of D is antimagic if no two vertices in D have the same vertex‐sum, where the vertex‐sum of a vertex for a labeling is the sum of labels of all arcs entering u minus the sum of labels of all arcs leaving u. Motivated by the conjecture of Hartsfield and Ringel from 1990 on antimagic labelings of graphs, Hefetz, Mütze, and Schwartz [On antimagic directed graphs, J. Graph Theory 64 (2010) 219–232] initiated the study of antimagic labelings of digraphs, and conjectured that every connected graph admits an antimagic orientation, where an orientation D of a graph G is antimagic if D has an antimagic labeling. It remained unknown whether every disjoint union of cycles admits an antimagic orientation. In this article, we first answer this question in the positive by proving that every 2‐regular graph has an antimagic orientation. We then show that for any integer , every connected, 2d‐regular graph has an antimagic orientation. Our technique is new.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A labeling of a digraph D with m arcs is a bijection from the set of arcs of D to . A labeling of D is antimagic if no two vertices in D have the same vertex‐sum, where the vertex‐sum of a vertex for a labeling is the sum of labels of all arcs entering u minus the sum of labels of all arcs leaving u. Motivated by the conjecture of Hartsfield and Ringel from 1990 on antimagic labelings of graphs, Hefetz, Mütze, and Schwartz [On antimagic directed graphs, J. Graph Theory 64 (2010) 219–232] initiated the study of antimagic labelings of digraphs, and conjectured that every connected graph admits an antimagic orientation, where an orientation D of a graph G is antimagic if D has an antimagic labeling. It remained unknown whether every disjoint union of cycles admits an antimagic orientation. In this article, we first answer this question in the positive by proving that every 2‐regular graph has an antimagic orientation. We then show that for any integer , every connected, 2d‐regular graph has an antimagic orientation. Our technique is new.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A labeling of a digraph D with m arcs is a bijection from the set of arcs of D to . A labeling of D is antimagic if no two vertices in D have the same vertex‐sum, where the vertex‐sum of a vertex for a labeling is the sum of labels of all arcs entering u minus the sum of labels of all arcs leaving u. Motivated by the conjecture of Hartsfield and Ringel from 1990 on antimagic labelings of graphs, Hefetz, Mütze, and Schwartz [On antimagic directed graphs, J. Graph Theory 64 (2010) 219–232] initiated the study of antimagic labelings of digraphs, and conjectured that every connected graph admits an antimagic orientation, where an orientation D of a graph G is antimagic if D has an antimagic labeling. It remained unknown whether every disjoint union of cycles admits an antimagic orientation. In this article, we first answer this question in the positive by proving that every 2‐regular graph has an antimagic orientation. We then show that for any integer , every connected, 2d‐regular graph has an antimagic orientation. Our technique is new.

Key concepts: Combinatorics, Mathematics, Bijection, Digraph, Conjecture, Vertex (graph theory), Edge-graceful labeling, Graph

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antimagic orientations of even regular graphs — Research Paper | ScholarLens