OVAW and hate
Kim Barker, Olga Jurasz
Abstract
Kim Barker, Olga Jurasz
Abstract
The social construction of online violence is flawed, as is the absence of appropriate regulation and enforcement. The (mis)perception that gender-based hate, both offline and online, is something incidental and particular to some women only, rather than occurring every day, on a large scale, and happening to women from a variety of demographics, is commonplace. Law certainly has a central role to play in addressing online misogyny. The continual gender-bias of the law — spanning its substantive provisions, procedural aspects, and legal actors — poses limitations to the transformative effects of any legal reform in this area. Any comprehensive legal response needs to take account of two concurrent factors characterising online misogyny — its gender-based nature and online manifestations. The substantive provisions which could be retro-fitted to potentially address online text-based abuses all have significantly high thresholds for prosecution — as such, it is therefore time for a refreshed, alternative approach which criminalises disruptive behaviour online.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The social construction of online violence is flawed, as is the absence of appropriate regulation and enforcement. The (mis)perception that gender-based hate, both offline and online, is something incidental and particular to some women only, rather than occurring every day, on a large scale, and happening to women from a variety of demographics, is commonplace. Law certainly has a central role to play in addressing online misogyny. The continual gender-bias of the law — spanning its substantive provisions, procedural aspects, and legal actors — poses limitations to the transformative effects of any legal reform in this area. Any comprehensive legal response needs to take account of two concurrent factors characterising online misogyny — its gender-based nature and online manifestations. The substantive provisions which could be retro-fitted to potentially address online text-based abuses all have significantly high thresholds for prosecution — as such, it is therefore time for a refreshed, alternative approach which criminalises disruptive behaviour online.
Key concepts: Political science