2018Unpublished venueOpen access

OVAW and hate

Kim Barker, Olga Jurasz

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The social construction of online violence is flawed, as is the absence of appropriate regulation and enforcement. The (mis)perception that gender-based hate, both offline and online, is something incidental and particular to some women only, rather than occurring every day, on a large scale, and happening to women from a variety of demographics, is commonplace. Law certainly has a central role to play in addressing online misogyny. The continual gender-bias of the law — spanning its substantive provisions, procedural aspects, and legal actors — poses limitations to the transformative effects of any legal reform in this area. Any comprehensive legal response needs to take account of two concurrent factors characterising online misogyny — its gender-based nature and online manifestations. The substantive provisions which could be retro-fitted to potentially address online text-based abuses all have significantly high thresholds for prosecution — as such, it is therefore time for a refreshed, alternative approach which criminalises disruptive behaviour online.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The social construction of online violence is flawed, as is the absence of appropriate regulation and enforcement. The (mis)perception that gender-based hate, both offline and online, is something incidental and particular to some women only, rather than occurring every day, on a large scale, and happening to women from a variety of demographics, is commonplace. Law certainly has a central role to play in addressing online misogyny. The continual gender-bias of the law — spanning its substantive provisions, procedural aspects, and legal actors — poses limitations to the transformative effects of any legal reform in this area. Any comprehensive legal response needs to take account of two concurrent factors characterising online misogyny — its gender-based nature and online manifestations. The substantive provisions which could be retro-fitted to potentially address online text-based abuses all have significantly high thresholds for prosecution — as such, it is therefore time for a refreshed, alternative approach which criminalises disruptive behaviour online.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The social construction of online violence is flawed, as is the absence of appropriate regulation and enforcement. The (mis)perception that gender-based hate, both offline and online, is something incidental and particular to some women only, rather than occurring every day, on a large scale, and happening to women from a variety of demographics, is commonplace. Law certainly has a central role to play in addressing online misogyny. The continual gender-bias of the law — spanning its substantive provisions, procedural aspects, and legal actors — poses limitations to the transformative effects of any legal reform in this area. Any comprehensive legal response needs to take account of two concurrent factors characterising online misogyny — its gender-based nature and online manifestations. The substantive provisions which could be retro-fitted to potentially address online text-based abuses all have significantly high thresholds for prosecution — as such, it is therefore time for a refreshed, alternative approach which criminalises disruptive behaviour online.

Key concepts: Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
OVAW and hate — Research Paper | ScholarLens